Steele and Galloway (No 2)
[2011] FamCA 878
FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| STEELE & GALLOWAY (NO 2) | [2011] FamCA 878 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN - Child related proceedings |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Steele |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Galloway |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Reid Family Lawyers |
| FILE NUMBER: | SYC | 6615 | of | 2007 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 14 September 2011 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Sydney |
| PLACE HEARD: | Sydney |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Fowler J |
| HEARING DATE: | 14 September 2011 |
REPRESENTATION
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Ms Adams |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Ms Donnelly |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | No appearance |
Orders
Orders are made in terms of paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of a document dated
13 September 2011, filed herein as set out hereunder:
"1.That pending Appeal, the child J shall spend time with the mother as follows:
1.1 at Central West Contact Service, each week as follows:
1.1.1 9.30 am to 1.30 pm on Saturday and
1.1.2 1.00 pm to 4.00 pm on Thursday.
3.That each of the parties shall forthwith do all acts and things and sign all documents necessary to complete the intake requirements of C Contact Service.
4.That the father or his nominee shall deliver J to, and collect J from, each contact event."
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Galloway and Steele has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
FILE NUMBER: SYC 6615 of 2007
| Ms Steele |
Applicant
And
| Mr Galloway |
Respondent
And
| Reid Family Lawyers |
Independent Children’s Lawyer
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
For reasons related to the matters that have passed between myself and those representing the parties, and in particular the desire of the mother to engage in search for employment during the week and the difficulties in additional costs and the like facing the father, it seems to me appropriate that I make orders in accordance with 1 and 3 and 4 of the orders proposed by the mother.
I decline to make at this stage order number 2. The decision in relation to the cost of such supervision was the subject of my judgment and Orders made in the proceedings but a short time ago.
So for those reasons I make Orders 1, 3 and 4 set forth in the Minute of Proposed Order of the mother initialled by me and placed with the papers.
I commend the parties to some discussions to see if a better solution can be procured in keeping with the tenor of my judgment but with a greater convenience and perhaps less cost to both parties.
I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of the Honourable Justice Fowler delivered on 14 September 2011.
Associate:
Date: 16 November 2011
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
0
0
0