| [2025] FWCA 2180 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Steel Cement Pty Ltd
(AG2025/1859)
STEEL CEMENT (YARAVILLE) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025-2028
| Cement and concrete products | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT FAROUQUE | MELBOURNE, 2 JULY 2025 |
Application for approval of the Steel Cement (Yarraville) Enterprise Agreement 2025 -2028
Steel Cement Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Steel Cement (Yarraville) Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028 (the Agreement), pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).
The agreement title on the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) that was issued to the employees was the “Steel Cement (Yarraville) Enterprise Agreement 2025-2027” which does not exactly match the title of the Agreement to be approved. The NERR was also not in the form prescribed by the regulations. I am satisfied that these matters were minor procedural or technical errors and that the employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged by them. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act to disregard these errors.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate seven days after approval.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE529558 PR788831>
- AGLC
- Steel Cement Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 2180
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 2180
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the agreement complied with the statutory criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. The court had to consider whether the agreement had been made in accordance with the good faith bargaining requirements, whether it was made without coercion or undue influence, and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. Additionally, the court had to examine whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement had been made in good faith, without coercion, and provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. The Commission considered the evidence presented by both parties and the provisions of the agreement, ultimately concluding that the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and approved the application for the agreement's registration.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Steel Cement (Yarraville) Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028, and it was registered as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act. The decision confirmed that the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval and provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.