Sednaoui v Amac Corrosion Protection Pty Ltd
[2017] VSCA 66
Citation 1
…as being the date of injury in this case means that it is bound by that actual date for these proceedings (see, Sednaoui v AMAC Corrosion Protection [2017] VSCA 66 at [67-69] which considered an earlier decision in Ansett v Taylor [2006] VSCA 71).…
Clarke v National Mutual Life Insurance Ltd
[2013] VSC 536
Citation 2
…the claim is not relevant to these issues. It is really a question as to the actual injury sustained by Mr Stebbing (see, Clarke v National Mutual [2013] VSC 536 at [54- 56]).…
R v Robertson
[2006] VSCA 71
Citation 3
…te for these proceedings (see, Sednaoui v AMAC Corrosion Protection [2017] VSCA 66 at [67-69] which considered an earlier decision in Ansett v Taylor [2006] VSCA 71).…
Hawkins v the Commonwealth of Australia
[1966] HCA 66
Citation 4
…n normal principles the date of injury in respect of an injury occurring over the course of employment would be the end-date of such employment (see, Hawkins v Commonwealth (1967) 116 CLR 159). As he was still employed by the State of Victoria at the time of submission of the claim form, that date may well be the relevant date…
Jones v Dunkel
[1959] HCA 8
Citation 5
…l Mr Evans, the campus principal who had more to do with Mr Stebbing on a daily basis than Mr Harnett. She relied on the provisions of Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 in that regard.…