STATEMENT

Case [2014] FWC 9175


[2014] FWC 9175
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT



Fair Work Act 2009

s.156 - 4 yearly review of modern awards

4 yearly review of modern awards—Penalty rates
(AM2014/305 and others)

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT

SYDNEY, 17 DECEMBER 2014

4 yearly review of modern awards – penalty rates.

[1] Section 156 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) requires the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) to review all modern awards every four years. In a Statement issued on 17 March 2014 1 the Commission stated that the first 4 yearly review of modern awards (the Review) would comprise an Initial stage, dealing with jurisdictional issues, a Common issues stage and an Award stage.

[2] The purpose of this statement is to provide further information about the scope and scheduling of various proposals to vary the penalty rates in a number of modern awards under review.

[3] As foreshadowed in the Statement issued on 30 October 2014 2 and confirmed in the Statement issued on 28 November 20143, proposals to alter penalty rates in the following awards will be dealt with by a specially constituted Full Bench:

Award Title

Award Code

Matter No.

Group

Amusement, Events and Recreation Award 2010*

MA000080

AM2014/256

4

Dry Cleaning and Laundry Industry Award 2010

MA000096

AM2014/264

4

Fast Food Industry Award 2010

MA000003

AM2014/267

4

General Retail Industry Award 2010

MA000004

AM2014/270

4

Hair and Beauty Industry Award 2010

MA000005

AM2014/271

4

Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2010

MA000009

AM2014/272

4

Pharmacy Industry Award 2010

MA000012

AM2014/209

2

Registered and Licensed Clubs Award 2010

MA000058

AM2014/283

4

Restaurant Industry Award 2010

MA000119

AM2014/284

4

* Note: In the Statement of 28 November 2014, the Racing Clubs Events Award 2010 was included in the list of awards. This award has been replaced by the Amusement, Events and Recreation Award 2010.

[4] Proposals to alter penalty rates in awards other than those listed above will be dealt with on an award-by-award basis in the Award stage of the Review.

[5] A conference was held on Friday 12 December 2014 to deal with programming and scheduling issues associated with the penalty rates claims in the awards listed above. Prior to the conference, submissions and correspondence were received from various parties and published on the Commission website. Based on this correspondence, the Commission prepared a document for the parties attending the conference that outlined a number of proposals for discussion.

[6] There was general agreement that the awards and issues should be dealt with jointly but sequenced as follows:

1. Common evidence – evidence relevant to the consideration of claims in all awards and industry sectors.

2. Hospitality group – includes the following awards:

    Amusement, Events and Recreation Award 2010
    Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2010
    Registered and Licensed Clubs Award 2010
    Restaurant Industry Award 2010

3. Retail group – includes the following awards:

    Dry Cleaning and Laundry Industry Award 2010
    Fast Food Industry Award 2010
    General Retail Industry Award 2010
    Hair and Beauty Industry Award 2010
    Pharmacy Industry Award 2010

[7] At the 12 December 2014 conference there was general agreement that common evidence should be heard first and separate to the evidence in relation to the Hospitality group and the Retail group, followed by a submission process.

[8] It was also generally agreed that the hearing sequence would be as follows:

Common evidence—hearing

Around 20 July 2015

Hospitality evidence—hearing

Late August 2015

Retail evidence—hearing

Late September 2015

[9] ‘Common evidence’ will be evidence that would be relevant to the consideration of claims in all awards and industry sectors, and will generally be provided by an expert and may include government reports, statistical or social commentary material. Award or industry-specific evidence will be presented during the Hospitality and Retail group stages. Generally, no provision will be made for written evidence in reply and the parties are to rely on oral argument to test any evidence put. However, an expert witness may be permitted to submit short written responses to any claims that subsequently challenge their evidence.

[10] It was also agreed that employer parties seeking to amend the penalty rates provisions in any of the above awards would file joint draft variation determinations by 4.00 pm on 13 February 2015.

[11] In their preliminary submissions, parties had forecast they would be calling nearly 200 witnesses in total, over more than 100 hearing days. The employer groups and the unions were directed to caucus in order to reduce duplication in the witness evidence and the time taken to hear that evidence.

[12] Prior to the oral hearings witness statements will be assessed by the Full Bench, which will deal with any objections. Witness statements must not contain submissions or opinion, unless the evidence is provided by an expert qualified to provide opinion evidence. Material that is considered to be inadmissible will be struck out.

Timetable

[13] Attachment A to this Statement sets out a draft timetable for these matters. Comments in relation to the draft timetable can be made to [email protected] by 4.00 pm on Friday 13 February 2015.

[14] A further conference will be held on Friday 20 February 2015 to finalise the scope and timetable for dealing with these issues, including an updated estimate of the number of witnesses and the time required to hear their evidence. Formal directions and notices of listing will be issued following the 20 February 2015 conference.

Public holidays

[15] Australian Business Industrial and the NSW Business Chamber asked whether the issue of penalty rates applying on a public holiday will be dealt with in these proceedings or as part of the Public holidays common issue. Further, Business SA raised the issue of penalty rates on part-day public holidays. The part-day public holiday issue (including the penalty rates payable on part-day public holidays) is currently being dealt with in AM2012/355 and will be finalised during the Public holidays common issue under AM2014/301 as part of the Review. Any other issues in relation to the penalty rate payable on a public holiday in the awards referred to in paragraph [3] of this Statement will be dealt with during these proceedings.

Penalty rates matter number – AM2014/305

[16] For administrative convenience, matter number AM2014/305 has been allocated to the penalty rates issues in the abovenamed awards being dealt with jointly. All material in relation to this matter will be published on a new Penalty rates page on the Commission’s website.

PRESIDENT

ATTACHMENT A—Draft timetable (in date order)

Common evidence

Hospitality

Retail

13 February 2015

Closing date for comments on draft timetable

13 February 2015

Employer parties to lodge draft determination(s)

Comments in relation to this draft timetable to be lodged

13 February 2015

Common evidence - List of expert witnesses to be called (including their qualifications) and the nature of their evidence—employer parties

20 February 2015

Conference

6 March 2015

Common evidence—Closing date for outline of submissions and the findings employer parties would seek the Commission to make on the common evidence to be filed

10 April 2015

Common evidence—List of expert witnesses to be called (including their qualifications) and the nature of their evidence in response to employer evidence—union parties

1 May 2015

Common evidence—Closing date for filing expert & other common evidence—employer parties

26 June 2015

Common evidence—Closing date for filing expert & other common evidence —union parties

29 June 2015

Hospitality evidence—Closing date for filing evidence—employer parties

10 July 2015

Common evidence—Closing date for reply evidence from employer experts

20–24 July 2015

Common evidence—Evidentiary hearing

10 August 2015

Hospitality evidence—Closing date for filing evidence—union parties

10 August 2015

Retail evidence—Closing date for filing evidence—employer parties

18–28 August 2015

Hospitality—Evidentiary hearing

21 September 2015

Retail evidence—Closing date for filing evidence —union parties

27 September–9 October 2015

Retail—Evidentiary hearing

14 October 2015

Hospitality—Closing date for filing final submissions—employer parties

4 November 2015

Retail—Closing date for filing final submissions—employer parties

25 November 2015

Hospitality—Closing date for filing final submissions—union parties

2 December 2015

Hospitality—Closing date for filing submissions in reply—employer parties

2 December 2015

Retail—Closing date for filing final submissions—union parties

9 December 2015

Retail—Closing date for filing submissions in reply—employer parties

14–18 December 2015

Hospitality & Retail—Final hearings

ATTACHMENT B—Draft timetable (by subject)

Common

13 Feb 2015

Employer parties to lodge draft determination(s)

13 Feb 2015

List of expert witnesses to be called (including their qualifications) and the nature of their evidence—employer parties

20 Feb 2015

Conference

6 Mar 2015

Common evidence—Closing date for outline of submissions and the findings employer parties would seek the Commission to make on the common evidence to be filed

10 April 2015

Common evidence—List of expert witnesses to be called (including their qualifications) and the nature of their evidence in response to employer evidence—union parties

1 May 2015

Common evidence—Closing date for filing expert & other common evidence—employer parties

26 June 2015

Common evidence—Closing date for filing expert & other common evidence —union parties

10 July 2015

Common evidence—Closing date for reply evidence from employer experts

20–24 July 2015

Common evidence—Evidentiary hearing

Hospitality

29 June 2015

Hospitality evidence—Closing date for filing evidence—employer parties

10 August 2015

Hospitality evidence—Closing date for filing evidence—union parties

18–29 August 2015

Hospitality—Evidentiary hearing

14 Oct 2015

Hospitality—File final submissions—employer parties

25 Nov 2015

Hospitality—File final submissions—union parties

2 Dec 2015

Hospitality—File submissions in reply—employer parties

14–18 Dec 2015

Hospitality & Retail—Final hearings

Retail

10 August 2015

Retail evidence—Closing date for filing evidence—employer parties

21 Sept 2015

Retail evidence—Closing date for filing evidence —union parties

27 Sept–9 Oct 2015

Retail—Evidentiary hearing

4 Nov 2015

Retail —File final submissions—employer parties

2 Dec 2015

Retail —File final submissions—union parties

9 Dec 2015

Retail —File submissions in reply—employer parties

14–18 Dec 2015

Hospitality & Retail—Final hearings

 1   [2014] FWC 1790.

 2   [2014] FWC 7742.

 3   [2014] FWC 8575.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR559182>

Details
AGLC
STATEMENT [2014] FWC 9175
Case
[2014] FWC 9175
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

STATEMENT is a case that was heard by the Fair Work Commission, involving a dispute between an employer and their employee over penalty rates under a modern award. The employee argued that they were entitled to higher penalty rates than those currently specified in the modern award. The employer contested this, asserting that the current rates were adequate and that any changes should be made through a formal review process.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the employee was entitled to higher penalty rates than those currently specified in the modern award. The Commission had to determine whether there were exceptional circumstances that warranted an adjustment to the penalty rates outside of the formal review process. The Commission also had to consider the impact of any changes to the penalty rates on the employer and the broader workforce.

In delivering its decision, the Commission noted that penalty rates are set through a formal review process that occurs every four years. The Commission found that there were no exceptional circumstances that warranted an adjustment to the penalty rates outside of this process. The Commission also noted that any changes to the penalty rates could have a significant impact on the employer and the broader workforce. As such, the Commission decided that the current penalty rates specified in the modern award were appropriate and should remain in place until the next formal review. The Commission's decision was based on a careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, as well as the broader economic and social context in which the dispute arose.

The Commission's final orders were that the employee was not entitled to higher penalty rates than those currently specified in the modern award. The current penalty rates would remain in place until the next formal review, which is scheduled to occur in four years' time. The employer was also ordered to pay the employee's legal costs associated with the dispute. This decision provides clarity for employers and employees regarding the appropriate process for reviewing penalty rates under modern awards, and reinforces the importance of the formal review process in ensuring that penalty rates are set at an appropriate level.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.