State of NSW v Coffey (No 3)

Case

[2003] NSWCA 85

22 April 2003

No judgment structure available for this case.

CITATION: State of NSW v Coffey (No 3) [2003] NSWCA 85
HEARING DATE(S): 28/10/02
JUDGMENT DATE:
22 April 2003
JUDGMENT OF: Meagher JA at 1; Ipp JA at 1
DECISION: 1. Appeal Allowed; 2. Judgment and verdict below set aside; 3. In lieu of verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $449,478.00, verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $459,947.00; 4. The appellant to pay the costs of the appeal, and of the trial.
CATCHWORDS: District Court - psychologically injured worker - safe system of work - appeal allowed.

PARTIES :

State of New South Wales
v
William Coffey
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40957 of 2001
COUNSEL: A: Mr Burbidge QC & Mr Wynyard
R: Mr Toomey QC & Mr Walker
SOLICITORS: A: Gillis Delaney Brown
R: Denis M Anderson
LOWER COURTJURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 2291 of 1999
LOWER COURT
JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Hosking DCJ


                          CA 40957 of 2001

                          MEAGHER JA
                          IPP JA

                          Tuesday, 22 April 2003
STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES v WILLIAM COFFEY
Judgment

1 THE COURT: On Monday, 25 November 2002 we made the following order, which we understood to be an order by consent:

iii. “In lieu of verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $463,947.00, verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $449,478.00;”

2 In fact the amount should be $459,947.00 .

3 The orders of the Court, therefore, will be:

i. Appeal allowed;

ii. Judgment and verdict below set aside;

iii. In lieu of verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $449,478.00, verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $459,947.00;

iv. The appellant to pay the costs of the appeal, and of the trial.

******

Last Modified: 05/05/2003

Areas of Law

  • Employment Law

  • Negligence & Tort

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Damages

  • Duty of Care

  • Negligence

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0