Star Television Productions Limited v Star Entertainment Group Limited
Case
•
[2019] ATMO 163
•13 November 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Star Television Productions Limited v Star Entertainment Group Limited [2019] ATMO 163
[2019] ATMO 163
13 November 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Star Television Productions Limited opposed an application by Star Entertainment Group Limited to remove its registered trade mark, number 859666, which comprised the word "STAR" with a star device and covered classes 16, 38, 41, and 42. The application for removal was brought under section 92 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth).
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the trade mark had been genuinely used in Australia in relation to the goods and services for which it was registered. Specifically, the court had to determine if Star Television Productions Limited had demonstrated sufficient use to justify the continued registration of the mark, or if it should be removed from the register due to non-use.
The court considered the evidence of use presented by Star Television Productions Limited. It applied the principles of trade mark law concerning genuine use, which requires more than token or sporadic use and necessitates use in the ordinary course of trade. The court's assessment would have focused on the nature, duration, and intensity of the use claimed by the opponent.
[The provided text does not contain information about the court's reasoning or the final outcome, so this paragraph cannot be completed.]
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the trade mark had been genuinely used in Australia in relation to the goods and services for which it was registered. Specifically, the court had to determine if Star Television Productions Limited had demonstrated sufficient use to justify the continued registration of the mark, or if it should be removed from the register due to non-use.
The court considered the evidence of use presented by Star Television Productions Limited. It applied the principles of trade mark law concerning genuine use, which requires more than token or sporadic use and necessitates use in the ordinary course of trade. The court's assessment would have focused on the nature, duration, and intensity of the use claimed by the opponent.
[The provided text does not contain information about the court's reasoning or the final outcome, so this paragraph cannot be completed.]
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Dunlop Aircraft Tyres Limited v The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company [2018] FCA 1014
Cases Citing This Decision
42
Oppositions by Monster Energy Company to registration of trade mark application numbers 2177560 (12, 35, 37) –
[2025] ATMO 124
Trade mark application number 2339182 (class 1)
[2025] ATMO 110
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
0
Trident Seafoods Corporation v Trident Foods Pty Ltd
[2016] ATMO 45
Murray Carter v Liberty Procurement Co. Inc
[2016] ATMO 83