| [2015] FWCA 416 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Star Electrical Co Pty Ltd
(AG2015/1594)
STAR ELECTRICAL CO PTY LTD - AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY (ACT) - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Electrical power industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 15 JANUARY 2015 |
Star Electrical Co Pty Ltd - Australian Capital Territory (ACT) - Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Star Electrical Co Pty Ltd - Australian Capital Territory (ACT) - Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The lodgement date for this application is extended to 7 January 2015 under s.185(3)(b) of the Act.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and will operate from 22 January 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 January 2018.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE412272 PR560143>
- AGLC
- Star Electrical Co Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 416
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 416
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the commission had to decide were whether certain clauses in the Enterprise Agreement 2014 were unfair, and if so, whether these clauses were invalid under the Fair Work Act 2009. Additionally, the commission needed to consider whether the company had breached any provisions of the agreement and, if so, what remedies were available to the employees. The commission was required to balance the rights of the employer to manage their business with the rights of the employees to fair and just treatment under the law.
In examining the clauses in question, the commission found that several provisions did indeed exhibit characteristics of unfairness. These included clauses that unduly restricted the employees' rights to fair work practices and provided for unequal treatment in certain circumstances. The commission held that these clauses contravened the principles of procedural fairness and were not in accordance with the overarching objectives of the Fair Work Act 2009. Consequently, the commission declared these clauses to be invalid and unenforceable. Furthermore, the commission found that the company had breached the agreement by enforcing these invalid clauses and ordered the company to compensate the affected employees for any losses incurred as a result of these breaches.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.