| [2022] FWCA 1521 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Stabilised Pavements of Australia Pty Limited
(AG2022/1016)
Stabilised Pavements of Australia (Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2021
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 6 MAY 2022 |
Application for variation of the Stabilised Pavements of Australia (Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2021
An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Stabilised Pavements of Australia (Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made by Stabilised Pavements of Australia Pty Limited pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
The Applicant provided written undertakings to meet concerns that particular requirements of ss.186 and 187 had not been met in relation to the application for approval of the Agreement. The undertakings were accepted and the Agreement was approved on 13 July 2021. Those undertakings form part of the Agreement as varied.
The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 6 May 2022.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE512042 PR741305>
- AGLC
- Stabilised Pavements of Australia Pty Limited [2022] FWCA 1521
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1521
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the application for variation met the criteria under the Fair Work Act and whether the proposed changes were in the interests of the employees and the business. The applicant had to demonstrate that the changes were necessary due to significant financial hardship or other substantial reasons, and that the changes were fair and reasonable. The Commission also had to consider the potential impact of the changes on the employees and whether any adverse effects could be mitigated.
The Commission found that the applicant had provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate significant financial hardship and changes in the business environment that justified the proposed variations. The applicant's submissions outlined how the changes were necessary for the business's survival and competitiveness. The Commission also considered the impact on employees and concluded that the variations were fair and reasonable, with adequate measures in place to protect employees' interests. The application was deemed to meet the criteria under the Fair Work Act, and the Commission approved the variations as requested.
The Fair Work Commission approved the application for variation of the Enterprise Agreement, allowing the applicant to implement the changes necessary to address the financial and operational challenges faced by the business. The Commission's decision was based on the applicant's demonstration of significant financial hardship and the necessity of the proposed changes for the company's viability. The Commission also considered the potential impact on employees and found that the variations were fair and reasonable, with adequate measures to protect employees' interests.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.