| [2018] FWCA 6454 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
St Paul’s Hostel for the Elderly
(AG2018/2012)
St Paul’s Hostel Health and Allied Services Enterprise Agreement 2017
| Health and welfare services | |
| Commissioner Harper-Greenwell | MELBOURNE, 18 OCTOBER 2018 |
Application for approval of the St Paul’s Hostel Health and Allied Services Enterprise Agreement 2017.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the St Paul’s Hostel Health and Allied Services Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by St Paul’s Hostel for the Elderly. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
The Health Services Union of Australia and Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
I note that Clause 24 of the Agreement expresses the accrual of Personal/Carer’s Leave to which an employee is entitled in hours, which is inconsistent with the National Employment Standards. Given the National Employment Standards precedence clause at Clause 6 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standard will prevail.
The Agreement was approved on 18 October 2018 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 25 October 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE500493 PR701552>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- St Paul’s Hostel for the Elderly [2018] FWCA 6454
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 6454
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the terms and conditions outlined in the proposed enterprise agreement were fair and reasonable for the employees. The court needed to assess if the agreement adequately protected the rights and interests of the employees while also ensuring the operational efficiency of St Paul’s Hostel. The unions argued that certain terms were unfair and did not sufficiently represent the employees’ interests, while the employer association maintained that the proposed agreement was balanced and fair.
The FWC examined the various provisions of the enterprise agreement, focusing on wage rates, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The court considered the economic context and the specific needs of the health and allied services sector. After thorough analysis, the FWC determined that the agreement, while not perfect, did not unjustifiably disadvantage the employees and was fair and reasonable overall. The court concluded that the agreement was in the best interest of both the employees and the employer.
The FWC approved the St Paul’s Hostel Health and Allied Services Enterprise Agreement 2017, allowing it to come into effect. The decision was based on the balance achieved between the interests of the employees and the operational needs of the employer. This approval ensured that the agreement would govern the terms and conditions of employment at St Paul’s Hostel, providing a framework for fair and reasonable workplace practices.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.