DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

St Mary’s Villa
(AG2016/3857)

ST MARY’S VILLA AND NSWNMA/ANMF ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2019

Health and welfare services
COMMISSIONER ROE	MELBOURNE, 23 AUGUST 2016

Application for approval of the St Mary’s Villa and NSWNMA/ANMF Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the St Mary’s Villa and NSWNMA/ANMF Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by St Mary’s Villa. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and New South Wales Nurses and Midwives’ Association, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 23 August 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 30 August 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of St Mary’s Villa involved an application for the approval of the St Mary’s Villa and the NSWNMA/ANMF Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019. The dispute arose in the context of industrial relations, specifically concerning the terms of employment and the need for approval of a collective agreement between the employer and the union representing the employees.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the enterprise agreement proposed between the employer and the union met the necessary statutory requirements for approval. This involved assessing the agreement against the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it contained essential protections for employees. The court had to determine if the agreement was fairly negotiated and if it provided a safety net of minimum entitlements for the employees.

In its reasoning, the court considered the submissions from both parties and the provisions of the Fair Work Act. The court found that the enterprise agreement was made in good faith, contained the required essential protections, and met the statutory criteria for approval. The court also examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated and concluded that it was fair and reasonable. Based on this, the court approved the enterprise agreement, recognising it as meeting the necessary standards for industrial relations under the Act.

The court's decision was that the St Mary’s Villa and NSWNMA/ANMF Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019 was approved, and the agreement was declared to be in effect. The court's approval ensured that the terms of the agreement would govern the employment conditions for the relevant period, providing clarity and certainty for both the employer and the employees.

St Mary’s Villa

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established