St George v Wallis - [2001] NSWSC 23

CITATION: St George v Wallis [2001] NSWSC 23

CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division
Commercial List

FILE NUMBER(S): SC 50571/92; 50049/93

HEARING DATE(S): 29/01/01, 30/01/01

JUDGMENT DATE:
2 February 2001

PARTIES :

St George Commercial Credit Corporation Limited - Plaintiff/Respondent
Barry Donald Wallis and Anne Wallis - Defendants/Applicants

JUDGMENT OF: Rolfe J

COUNSEL : Mr C.R.C. Newlinds - Plaintiff/Respondent
Mr P.M. Biscoe QC - Defendants/Applicants

SOLICITORS: Kemp Strang - Plaintiff/Respondent
Bowles and Company - Defendants/Applicants

CATCHWORDS: Notice of Motion - Finalisation of Proceedings

LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Act 1970
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976

CASES CITED: Phillips v Walsh (1990) 20 NSWLR 206
Roberts v Gippsland Agricultural and Earth Moving Contracting Co Pty Limited [1956] VLR 555
Darling Downs Investments Pty Limited v Ellwood (1988) 18 FCR 510
Spies v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 24 NSWLR 691

DECISION: (a) Judgment for Mr and Mrs Wallis against St George Commercial Credit Corporation Limited in the sum of $279,776.06; (b) St George Commercial Credit Corporation Limited pay the costs of Mr and Mrs Wallis of the Notice of Motion filed on 28 September 2000; (c) The exhibits be returned at the expiration of twenty-eight (28) days unless within that period an appeal against this decision has been brought

INDEX

PARA

Introduction
(i) The Issues 1
(ii) The Initial Proceedings 2
(iii) The Letters Giving Rise To The Present Claim 11
(iv) The Orders Made At First Instance 15
(v) The Proceedings On Appeal 16
(vi) What Happened Thereafter 26

The Construction Argument 32

The Declaration 46

Are The Proceedings Properly Constituted 48

Interest 63

THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
EQUITY DIVISION
COMMERCIAL LIST

ROLFE J

FRIDAY, 2 FEBRUARY 2001

50571/92
50049/93 - ST GEORGE COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION LIMITED v WALLIS & ANOR

JUDGMENT

HIS HONOUR:

1 (i) The Issues

The two major issues raised by the Notice of Motion, which was filed on 28 September 2000 on behalf of Mr Barry Donald Wallis and his wife, Mrs Anne Wallis, for whom Mr P.M. Biscoe of Queen’s Counsel appeared, are whether:-
(a) Mr and Mrs Wallis are, in the events which have happened, entitled to recover from St George Commercial Credit Corporation Limited, (“St George”), for which Mr C.R.C. Newlinds of Counsel appeared, $156,099.99, together with interest thereon pursuant to s.94 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 from 23 August 1993, on which date that amount was paid to St George from the balance of the proceeds of the sale by Mr and Mrs Wallis of their home at 14 Raleigh Street, Blakehurst, to the date of judgment; and
(b) it is appropriate for this claim to be brought forward by way of a Notice of Motion in the original proceedings, rather than by the institution of separate substantive proceedings.

The Notice of Motion was supported by the affidavit of the solicitor for Mr and Mrs Wallis, Mr Denis Gordon Bowles sworn 21 September 2000. There was no objection to any part of it and Mr Bowles was not required…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read St George v Wallis and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2001] NSWSC 23
Decision Date: 2 February 2001

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of St George v Wallis involved a dispute between the defendant, St George Bank, and the plaintiff, Mr Wallis. The dispute arose from a loan agreement, where the bank had advanced funds to Mr Wallis. The matter was heard in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The key issue before the court was whether the bank had the right to finalise the proceedings related to the loan agreement and whether Mr Wallis had any outstanding obligations or defences to prevent the finalisation of the proceedings.

The court examined the contractual terms between the parties and considered the procedural history of the case. The bank argued that all issues between the parties had been resolved, and there were no remaining matters for adjudication. Mr Wallis, on the other hand, contended that there were unresolved issues and defences that needed to be addressed. The court needed to determine whether the bank's motion to finalise the proceedings was justified and whether it complied with the relevant legal requirements.

After reviewing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, the court found that the bank had fulfilled its obligations under the loan agreement and that there were no outstanding issues or defences presented by Mr Wallis. The court concluded that the bank's motion to finalise the proceedings was appropriate and in accordance with the applicable law. Consequently, the court granted the bank's motion to finalise the proceedings. The court's decision was based on the bank's ability to demonstrate that all matters between the parties had been resolved and that there were no further issues to be adjudicated.

Orders