FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| ST GEORGE BANK LIMITED v FIELD | [2009] FMCA 519 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Bankruptcy petition – opposition based on pending litigation against creditor – whether ‘other sufficient cause’ for dismissing or adjourning petition – likelihood of obtaining verdict exceeding or removing creditor’s debt – insufficient merit shown in litigation – other relevant considerations – sequestration order made. |
| Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss.52(2)(b), 52(5) |
| Field v Jenolan Caves Resort Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 491 Ling v Enrobrook Pty Ltd (1997) 74 FCR 19 St George Bank Ltd v Field [2007] NSWSC 902 Totev v Sfar [2006] FCA 470 |
| Applicant: | ST GEORGE BANK LIMITED |
| Respondent: | ARCHER PHILLIP FIELD |
| File Number: | SYG 2887 of 2008 |
| Judgment of: | Smith FM |
| Hearing date: | 22 May 2009 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 10 June 2009 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr P Dowdy |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Henry Davis York |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr R Newton |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | The Peoples Solicitors Pty Ltd |
ORDERS
A sequestration order be made against the estate of ARCHER PHILLIP FIELD.
The applicant creditor’s costs, including all reserved costs, be taxed and paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
All proceedings under the sequestration order are stayed under s.52(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) until 5pm on 17 June 2009, on the following conditions:
(a)that Mr Field shall not dispose of any property which may be vested in his trustee in bankruptcy exceeding $5,000 except with the agreement of his trustee,
(b)that Mr Field shall not enter into or incur any new liability exceeding the amount of $5,000, or such other amount as is agreed upon by his trustee.
Note that the date of the act of bankruptcy is 13 May 2008.
Note that a consent to act as trustee has been signed by David Kerr and has been lodged with the Official Receiver in Sydney.
The applicant must within 2 days give a copy of this order to the Official Receiver in Sydney.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 2887 of 2008
| ST GEORGE BANK LIMITED |
Applicant
And
| ARCHER PHILLIP FIELD |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In this petition, the Bank relies upon a debt against Mr Field for $6,800,632.72 under a judgment of the Supreme Court of NSW made on 8 August 2007. Mr Field does not challenge his indebtedness, nor an act of bankruptcy arising upon non-compliance with a bankruptcy notice which was served on 26 November 2007. He concedes that the Bank has established a prima facie entitlement to the making of a sequestration order. However, he invites the Court to exercise its discretion to decline to do this on the ground that it may be satisfied “that for other sufficient cause a sequestration order ought not to be made” within s.52(2)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). This is because he has commenced Federal Court and Supreme Court proceedings claiming damages and other relief against the Bank and other…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read St George Bank Ltd v Field and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2009] FMCA 519
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether Field had indeed committed acts of bankruptcy and if so, whether the conditions for a sequestration order were met. The bank had to demonstrate that Field's liabilities exceeded his assets, and that he was unable to pay his debts. The court also had to consider the appropriate conditions for the stay of proceedings and the management of Field’s estate post-sequestration.
The court found that the bank had substantiated the allegations of Field's insolvency and his failure to comply with the bankruptcy notice. It was established that Field’s debts significantly outweighed his assets, leading to the conclusion that he was indeed unable to pay his debts. The judge granted the sequestration order and imposed specific conditions on the stay of proceedings to protect Field's estate from further financial deterioration. The court ordered that Field was not to dispose of any property exceeding $5,000 without the consent of his trustee and was to avoid incurring new liabilities over the same threshold.
The final orders included the sequestration of Field's estate, the taxation of costs in favour of the bank, and the imposition of specific conditions on the estate's management. The court also noted the effective date of the act of bankruptcy and the consent of the appointed trustee. The bank was required to promptly notify the Official Receiver of the court's decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
A sequestration order be made against the estate of ARCHER PHILLIP FIELD.
2.
The applicant creditor’s costs, including all reserved costs, be taxed and paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
3.
All proceedings under the sequestration order are stayed under s.52(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) until 5pm on 17 June 2009, on the following conditions:
(a) that Mr Field shall not dispose of any property which may be vested in his trustee in bankruptcy exceeding $5,000 except with the agreement of his trustee,
(b) that Mr Field shall not enter into or incur any new liability exceeding the amount of $5,000, or such other amount as is agreed upon by his trustee.
4.
Note that the date of the act of bankruptcy is 13 May 2008.
5.
Note that a consent to act as trustee has been signed by David Kerr and has been lodged with the Official Receiver in Sydney.
6.
The applicant must within 2 days give a copy of this order to the Official Receiver in Sydney.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.