SRW Services Pty Ltd T/A Innotech Site Services

Case

[2016] FWCA 9066

16 DECEMBER 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2016] FWCA 9066
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

SRW Services Pty Ltd T/A Innotech Site Services
(AG2016/6814)

SRW SERVICES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER ROE

MELBOURNE, 16 DECEMBER 2016

Application for approval of the SRW Services Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SRW Services Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by SRW Services Pty Ltd T/A Innotech Site Services. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] The Agreement was approved on 16 December 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 23 December 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 November 2020.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE422734  PR588688>

ANNEXURE A

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0