SRSW Pty Ltd T/A Stellar Recruitment

Link copied
Case Copied 38 min read
[2019] FWCA 8699
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

SRSW Pty Ltd T/A Stellar Recruitment
(AG2019/2117)

SRSW ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019

Coal industry

COMMISSIONER SPENCER

BRISBANE, 23 DECEMBER 2019

Application for approval of the SRSW Enterprise Agreement 2019.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SRSW Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by SRSW Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Union advanced concerns regarding the Agreement that included sections 186, 187 and 188 of the Act. The matters of contention between the parties are dealt with accordingly below, some of which have been dealt with by undertakings.

[3] This application has been the subject of a series of Directions for further information, a conference and a Hearing on Thursday, 19 December 2019. A summary of the agreed and outstanding issues were recorded in a table provided by the parties prior to the Hearing. At the time of the Hearing, further information was proposed. Subsequent to the Hearing, a further exchange of undertakings occurred. Those are attached to this decision.

National Employment Standards

[4] The Union raised a number of objections related to section 186(2)(c) of the Act. Section 186(2)(c) requires that an Agreement not contravene section 55 of the Act. The Union’s specific objections were in relation to annual leave and public holidays.

Clause 15.1 – Annual Leave

[5] The Union submitted that clause 15.1 of the Agreement is in contravention of section 55 of the Act. The Agreement states that unless otherwise agreed, employees are to provide 4 weeks’ notice of their intention to take annual leave. The Union asserted that this obligation is detrimental to the employees and contrary to section 88 of the National Employment Standards (NES) which provides:

“The employer must not unreasonably refuse to agree to a request by the employee to take paid annual leave”.

[6] It is the Union’s position that, as required by section 186(2)(c) of the Act, the Commission cannot be satisfied that clause 15.1 of the Agreement does not contravene section 55 of the Act

[7] In response to the Union’s position, the Applicant made reference to section 93(4) of the NES which provides:

“A modern award or enterprise agreement may include terms otherwise dealing with the taking of paid annual leave.”

[8] The Applicant stated that the Union’s objection relies upon section 88 of the NES which deals with “Taking Paid Annual Leave”. Further to this, the Applicant submitted that section 94(4) expressly permits terms, “otherwise dealing with the taking of paid annual leave” and contended that the provision of notice for the taking of annual leave is otherwise dealing with the taking of annual leave.

[9] In addition, the Applicant referred to section 55(3) of the Act which provides:

“The National Employment Standards have…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read SRSW Pty Ltd T/A Stellar Recruitment and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] FWCA 8699
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

SRSW Pty Ltd, trading as Stellar Recruitment, applied for approval of the SRSW Enterprise Agreement 2019. The dispute arose between the company and the Australian Services Union, representing the employees, before the Fair Work Commission. The crux of the disagreement centred on the terms and conditions set out in the proposed agreement, particularly those relating to employee entitlements, working hours, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, including provisions concerning minimum entitlements, procedural fairness, and the avoidance of adverse action against employees. The Commission also needed to determine if the agreement was made in good faith and whether it adhered to the principles of enterprise bargaining as outlined in the Act.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement largely complied with the statutory requirements. The Commission acknowledged that while there were minor discrepancies in the articulation of some entitlements, these did not significantly detract from the overall fairness of the agreement. The Commission concluded that the agreement was made in good faith and was conducive to a productive bargaining process. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, subject to minor amendments to ensure clarity and compliance with the Act.

The final orders of the Commission were that the SRSW Enterprise Agreement 2019 be approved, with the specified minor amendments to be incorporated before the agreement comes into effect. This decision ensures that the terms of the agreement are clear, fair, and legally compliant, providing a solid foundation for the employment relationship between the company and its employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.