| [2015] FWCA 3849 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
SRG Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2015/2804)
SRG MINING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD QLD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Mining industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 10 JUNE 2015 |
Application for approval of the SRG Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd QLD Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] SRG Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd applies for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SRG Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd QLD Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] On 5 June 2015 undertakings were provided by the Employer. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Employer’s undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act I note that a copy of the undertakings is attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement does not contain a flexibility clause in accordance with the Act. Pursuant s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 1 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 17 June 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 10 June 2019.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
1 Section 2.08 and Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE414245 PR568120>
- AGLC
- SRG Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 3849
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 3849
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated and the content of the agreement itself. It considered whether the bargaining was conducted in good faith and whether the agreement addressed the genuine needs of the employees. The Commission also assessed whether the agreement contained terms that were harsh, unjust, or unreasonable, and if it provided adequate protections and benefits for the employees. The Commission's decision hinged on ensuring that the agreement was fair and effective, balancing the interests of both parties and adhering to the legislative framework.
In its reasoning, the Fair Work Commission concluded that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and contained terms that were fair and reasonable. The Commission found that the bargaining process met the requirements of good faith and that the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of the employer and employees. It determined that the agreement did not include any harsh, unjust, or unreasonable terms, and that it provided adequate protections and benefits for the employees. Therefore, the Fair Work Commission approved the SRG Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd 2014 Queensland Enterprise Agreement.
The Fair Work Commission's final orders included the approval of the 2014 Queensland Enterprise Agreement between SRG Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd and its employees. The decision emphasised the importance of genuine negotiation and the fair balance of interests in enterprise agreements, setting a precedent for future agreements in similar contexts.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.