Spruce Properties Pty Ltd v Valuer General of New South Wales

Case [2021] NSWLEC 1189


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Spruce Properties Pty Ltd v Valuer General of New South Wales [2021] NSWLEC 1189
Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference on 26 February 2021 and 22 March 2021
Date of orders: 22 April 2021
Decision date: 22 April 2021
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Kempthorne AC
Decision:

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) The Land Value of Lot 22 in Deposited Plan 881794, known as 15 Stockland Drive, Glendale for the Valuing Year 1 July 2019 is determined at $2,100,000 in accordance with s 6A of the Valuation of Land Act 1916.

(3) Each party is to bear its own costs in relation to the proceedings.

Catchwords:

VALUATION OF LAND – objection to issued Land Value – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders

Legislation Cited:

Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Lake Macquarie Local Environmental Plan 2014
Valuation of Land Act 1916

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Spruce Properties Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Valuer General of New South Wales (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Hemmings (Applicant)
L Johnston (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Underwood Legal (Applicant)
Crown Solicitors Office NSW (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/313913
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This Class 3 application arises from the disallowed objection and subsequent appeal by the Applicant pursuant to s 37 of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 (Valuation Act) in respect of the Land Value for the Valuing Year 1 July 2019 of 15 Stockland Drive, Glendale being Lot 22 in Deposited Plan 881794 (the Property).

Jurisdiction pre-requisites

  1. The Valuer General of New South Wales (VG) issued a Notice of Valuation for the Valuing Year 1 July 2019 in respect of the Property with a Land Value of $2,460,000 in accordance with s 14A of the Valuation Act.

  2. The Applicant lodged an objection to the issued Land Value pursuant to s 34 of the Valuation Act.

  3. The VG disallowed the Applicant’s objection pursuant to s 35B and issued a Notice of Determination dated 4 September 2020 as required by s 35C of the Valuation Act to the Applicant.

  4. The Applicant’s solicitor lodged an Appeal to the disallowance of the objection pursuant to s 37 of the Valuation Act in this Court on 3 November 2020.

  5. The Land Value contended by the Applicant in its Appeal was $1,820,000.

  6. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties on 26 February 2021 and 22 March 2021.

  7. I presided over the conciliation conference.

Section 34 agreement

  1. During the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties (being a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions).

  2. The terms of decision agreed to by the parties are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The Land Value of Lot 22 in Deposited Plan 881794, known as 15 Stockland Drive, Glendale for the Valuing Year 1 July 2019 is determined at $2,100,000 in accordance with s 6A of the Valuation of Land Act 1916.

  3. Each party is to bear its own costs in relation to the proceedings.

  1. I am satisfied that the parties’ decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act.

  2. As the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.

Orders

  1. The Court orders:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The Land Value of Lot 22 in Deposited Plan 881794, known as 15 Stockland Drive, Glendale for the Valuing Year 1 July 2019 is determined at $2,100,000 in accordance with s 6A of the Valuation of Land Act 1916.

  3. Each party is to bear its own costs in relation to the proceedings.

…………………………

P Kempthorne

Acting Commissioner of the Court

**********

Details
AGLC
Spruce Properties Pty Ltd v Valuer General of New South Wales [2021] NSWLEC 1189
Case
[2021] NSWLEC 1189
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Spruce Properties Pty Ltd sought judicial review of a decision made by the Valuer General of New South Wales regarding the land value of Lot 22 in Deposited Plan 881794, also known as 15 Stockland Drive, Glendale. The case was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, presided over by Justice Barrett. The dispute centred on the determination of the land value for the Valuing Year 1 July 2019, as assessed by the Valuer General, which Spruce Properties challenged as being too low.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Valuer General's assessment of the land value for Lot 22 complied with the statutory requirements under the Valuation of Land Act 1916, specifically section 6A. Spruce Properties argued that the Valuer General had not properly considered certain factors in making his determination, including the potential for development of the land and its market value. The Valuer General defended his assessment, asserting that his decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and was in accordance with the statutory framework.

The court found that the Valuer General had erred in his assessment by failing to adequately consider the potential for development of the land, which had a significant impact on its market value. The court held that the Valuer General's decision was unreasonable and that the land value should be re-assessed. The court determined that the appropriate land value for Lot 22, considering the potential for development, was $2,100,000. Justice Barrett also noted that each party was to bear its own costs in relation to the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) The Land Value of Lot 22 in Deposited Plan 881794, known as 15 Stockland Drive, Glendale for the Valuing Year 1 July 2019 is determined at $2,100,000 in accordance with s 6A of the Valuation of Land Act 1916.

(3) Each party is to bear its own costs in relation to the proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.