Spencer v Spencer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The application in Spencer v Spencer concerned the applicant's request for an extension of time to file an application for special leave to appeal a decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia. The matter was heard by Bell and Gageler JJ of the High Court of Australia. The Full Court had previously dismissed an appeal from a decision of the Family Court of Australia regarding a parenting matter, and the applicant sought to appeal this decision to the High Court.

The central legal issue was whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file an application for special leave to appeal. The applicant argued that the extension was necessary due to delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The court had to consider whether the proposed appeal raised questions of principle and whether it had sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. The court also had to weigh the potential merits of the appeal against the futility of granting the extension.

In their judgment, Bell and Gageler JJ held that the proposed appeal raised no question of principle and did not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. The court found that the applicant's reasons for the delay were insufficient to justify an extension of time. The judges concluded that it would be futile to grant the extension, and therefore, special leave to appeal should be refused. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application.

Keep reading for free

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established

V.M Bell	S.J Gageler
12 November 2020