SPENCER & MARKS - [2011] FamCA 174

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SPENCER & MARKS

[2011] FamCA 174

FAMILY LAW - PROPERTY – interim property settlement – whether such an order under ss 79 and 80(1)(h) is “just and equitable” and appropriate in the circumstances.

Family Law Act (1975) Cth: ss 75(2), 79, 80(1)(h)

Strachan & Strachan (2009) FamCAFC 166; Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; O’Meara v Dominican Fathers [2003] ACTCA 24

APPLICANT:

Mr Spencer

RESPONDENT:

Ms Marks

FILE NUMBER:

SYC

2429

2010

DATE DELIVERED:

11 March 2011

PLACE DELIVERED:

Sydney

PLACE HEARD:

Sydney

JUDGMENT OF:

Rose J

HEARING DATE:	27 January 2011; 7-8 February 2011
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:	15, 21 & 28 February 2011

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT:

B Richards and T Messner

SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT:

Paltos Briggs

COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT:

J Levy

SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT:

Barkus Doolan Kelly

Orders

Interim property orders

That the husband forthwith sign all documents and do all acts and things necessary to cause the sale of his … foot … boat (“the boat”) at the best price reasonably obtainable and he shall apply the sale proceeds as follows:
(a) payment of selling costs, if any;
(b)payment of mortgage arrears (“the mortgage arrears”) pursuant to the mortgage granted over the property situate at …, N (“the former matrimonial home”);
(c)payment to the husband of the balance, if any, remaining.
That the husband promptly provide the wife through her solicitors with written particulars of the manner of listing the boat for sale, all offers for purchase received by him or on his behalf, copies of the sale agreement, particulars of all arrangements made for completion of sale and copy of the cheque/s and bank statement/s showing payment and receipt of the selling price.
That until further order the husband is restrained from selling, transferring or encumbering the boat other than for the purpose of complying with Orders made this day.
That the husband promptly provide written particulars of the annual bonus, if any, received by him at any time in 2011.
That in the event of the husband receiving his annual bonus prior to the sale of the boat referred to Order 1 he shall forthwith apply that bonus in satisfaction of the mortgage arrears in relation to the former matrimonial home.
That until further order the husband promptly pay all mortgage instalments in relation to the mortgage over the former matrimonial home as and when they fall due.
That the remaining applications of the parties for interim property orders are dismissed.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Spencer & Marks is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

FILE NUMBER: SYC2429 of 2010

Mr Spencer

Applicant

And

Ms Marks

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

In these proceedings the applicant husband (“the husband”) sought interim property settlement orders in accordance with his Application in a Case filed 20 September 2010. Subsequently, that application was amended unopposed by the Minute of…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read SPENCER & MARKS and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2011] FamCA 174
Decision Date: 11 March 2011

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Family Court of Australia, Rose J considered an application for interim property orders between a husband and wife. The dispute concerned the husband's obligation to sell his boat and apply the proceeds towards mortgage arrears on the former matrimonial home, as well as other financial disclosures and payments.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether an interim property settlement order, specifically concerning the sale of the husband's boat and the application of sale proceeds, was "just and equitable" and appropriate in the circumstances of the case. The court also had to determine the husband's obligations regarding the provision of financial particulars, particularly concerning his annual bonus, and his responsibility for ongoing mortgage payments on the former matrimonial home.

Rose J reasoned that an order for the sale of the boat was necessary to address the pressing issue of mortgage arrears on the former matrimonial home, thereby preserving the asset and preventing further financial detriment. The court applied principles of family law concerning the just and equitable distribution of property, even at an interim stage, to ensure that urgent financial obligations were met. The court also considered the need for transparency and accountability in financial dealings between the parties.

The court made interim orders requiring the husband to sell his boat and apply the proceeds to selling costs and mortgage arrears, with any balance to be paid to him. The husband was also ordered to provide particulars of the sale process and any offers received. Further orders restrained the husband from dealing with the boat except as directed, required him to disclose his annual bonus, and mandated its use for mortgage arrears if received before the boat's sale. The husband was also ordered to continue making mortgage payments on the former matrimonial home. The remaining applications for interim property orders were dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Interim property orders

That the husband forthwith sign all documents and do all acts and things necessary to cause the sale of his … foot … boat (“the boat”) at the best price reasonably obtainable and he shall apply the sale proceeds as follows:

(a) payment of selling costs, if any;

(b) payment of mortgage arrears (“the mortgage arrears”) pursuant to the mortgage granted over the property situate at …, N (“the former matrimonial home”);

That the husband promptly provide the wife through her solicitors with written particulars of the manner of listing the boat for sale, all offers for purchase received by him or on his behalf, copies of the sale agreement, particulars of all arrangements made for completion of sale and copy of the cheque/s and bank statement/s showing payment and receipt of the selling price.

That until further order the husband is restrained from selling, transferring or encumbering the boat other than for the purpose of complying with Orders made this day.

That the husband promptly provide written particulars of the annual bonus, if any, received by him at any time in 2011.

That in the event of the husband receiving his annual bonus prior to the sale of the boat referred to Order 1 he shall forthwith apply that bonus in satisfaction of the mortgage arrears in relation to the former matrimonial home.

That until further order the husband promptly pay all mortgage instalments in relation to the mortgage over the former matrimonial home as and when they fall due.

That the remaining applications of the parties for interim property orders are dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.