Speedworx Pty Ltd v Bunbury Car Club (Inc)

Case [2005] WASC 16


JURISDICTION     :   SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

IN CHAMBERS

CITATION:   SPEEDWORX PTY LTD -v- BUNBURY CAR CLUB (INC) & ORS [2005] WASC 16

CORAM:   MASTER NEWNES

HEARD:   8 FEBRUARY 2005

DELIVERED          :   25 FEBRUARY 2005

FILE NO/S:   CIV 2347 of 2004

BETWEEN:   SPEEDWORX PTY LTD (ACN 070 004 223)

Plaintiff

AND

BUNBURY CAR CLUB (INC)
First Defendant

PETER CHARLES NEWMAN
PHILIP ALAN ROSE
MARGARET ANN PADMORE
NEIL CRAM
MAXWELL JAMES DUNSTAN
BRIAN MOYLE
HARRY WILLIAM BISHOP
BRIAN LEE
JENNIFER KAY LOWE
Second Defendants

Catchwords:

Practice and procedure - Application to strike out claim - Incorporated association - Whether committee members liable for inducing association to breach contract with plaintiff - Security for costs - Quantum - Turns on own facts

Legislation:

Associations Incorporation Act 1987 (WA)

Result:

Claim against second defendants struck out
Order for security for costs of first defendant

Category:    B

Representation:

Counsel:

Plaintiff:        Mr G M Jordan

First Defendant               :        Mr M J Feutrill

First to Third and Fifth to

Ninth-named Second Defendants    :        Mr M J Feutrill

Fourth-named Second Defendant    :        Mr P E Harris

Solicitors:

Plaintiff:        Michael Whyte & Co

First Defendant               :        Max Owens & Co

First to Third and Fifth to

Ninth-named Second Defendants    :        Max Owens & Co

Fourth-named Second Defendant    :        Max Owens & Co

Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Biscayne Partners Pty Ltd v Valance Corp Pty Ltd & Ors [2003] NSWSC 874

Dalgety Australia Ltd v Rubin; unreported, SCt of WA, Library No 5485, 24 August 1984

Fightvision Pty Ltd v Onisforou (1999) 47 NSWLR 473

Hospital Contributions Fund of Australia v Hunt (1983) 44 ALR 365

O'Brien v Dawson (1942) 66 CLR 18

Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control Technologies Pty Ltd (2000) 177 ALR 231

Said v Butt [1920] 3 KB 497

Short v City Bank of Sydney (1912) 15 CLR 148

Tsaprazis v Goldcrest Properties Pty Ltd (2000) 18 ACLC 285

Case(s) also cited:

Ex-Christmas Islanders Association (2002) Inc and Department of Transport and Regional Development 70 ALD 151

Kimberley Downs Pty Ltd & Ors v The State of Western Australia & Anor, unreported; SCt of WA; Library No 6414; 25 August 1986

  1. MASTER NEWNES:  I have before me three applications in this matter.  The first defendant has applied for security for costs.  The second defendants (apart from Mr Cram, who has agreed with the plaintiff to abide the result) have applied to strike out the claim against them as disclosing no reasonable cause of action and, if that application is unsuccessful, for security for costs.

  2. The first defendant is an incorporated association under the Associations Incorporation Act 1987 (WA). It is a non‑profit organisation and, as its name suggests, is involved in motor sport in Bunbury.

  3. In the action the plaintiff alleges that from some time prior to 1987 the City of Bunbury has leased to the first defendant certain land on which a speedway track is constructed.  The land concerned is Crown land.  The plaintiff says that from 1999 it occupied the…

Continue reading Speedworx Pty Ltd v Bunbury Car Club (Inc)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Speedworx Pty Ltd v Bunbury Car Club (Inc) [2005] WASC 16
Case
[2005] WASC 16
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Speedworx Pty Ltd brought an action against the Bunbury Car Club (Inc) for breach of contract, with a claim that the club's committee members were also liable for inducing the association to breach the contract. The club applied to have the claims against the committee members struck out and for an order for security for costs. The primary focus of the dispute was whether the committee members were personally liable for the club's actions. The Federal Circuit Court had to determine the applicability of the law concerning the liability of committee members of an incorporated association for actions taken on behalf of the association, as well as the appropriate quantum of security for costs.

The court needed to resolve whether the committee members of the Bunbury Car Club (Inc) could be held personally liable for the club's alleged breach of contract, and if so, to what extent. Additionally, the court had to consider the appropriate quantum of security for costs that the plaintiff should provide to cover potential costs if the defendant were to be successful in its application to strike out the claims against the committee members.

The court found that the committee members were not personally liable for the actions of the association, as they were acting in their capacity as representatives of the club and not in a personal capacity. Consequently, the claims against the committee members were struck out. Regarding the security for costs, the court determined that the plaintiff should provide a security of $10,000, taking into account the nature of the case, the risk of the plaintiff being unsuccessful, and the potential costs that might be awarded to the defendant if the application were successful. The court held that the plaintiff's ability to pay this amount did not unduly prejudice its capacity to fairly prosecute or defend the proceeding.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.