Spectrum Brands Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 710


[2025] FWCA 710

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Spectrum Brands Australia Pty Ltd

(AG2025/395)

SPECTRUM BRANDS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Retail industry

COMMISSIONER REDFORD

MELBOURNE, 26 FEBRUARY 2025

Application for approval of the Spectrum Brands Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Spectrum Brands Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Spectrum Brands Australia Pty Ltd (Spectrum). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

Undertakings

  1. In response to several issues raised with Spectrum in relation to its application, it has provided written undertakings, a copy of which are attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement. 

  1. The undertakings relate to:  

a.Overtime for Part Time Employees

b.Overtime on Saturdays

c.Overtime on Sundays

Interaction with the National Employment Standards

  1. Clause 7.1 of the Agreement provides that if a term of the agreement is detrimental to an employee when compared with the National Employment Standards (NES) the NES will prevail (NES precedence clause). On this basis, I am satisfied that the apparent inconsistencies with the NES outlined below do not prevent the approval of this agreement:

a.Clauses 22.5, 24.6 and 25.2 of the agreement each purport to confer on the employer a right to make deductions from or not pay employee entitlements in certain circumstances. Clause 22.5 relates to circumstances where an employee takes annual leave in advance, and the employment ends before the entitlement is accrued. Clause 24.6 deals with dismissal for serious misconduct. Clause 25.2 deals with circumstances in which an employee resigns their employment without providing requisite notice. As a result of the NES precedence clause, each of these provisions must be read subject to the operation of the NES, which provides for the payment of employee entitlements on termination. Even if the Agreement appears to confer a right upon the employer to make deductions, if the NES provides for the payment to an employee of entitlements in particular circumstances, the entitlement will prevail by operation of clause 7.1 of the Agreement.

Consideration

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate 7 days after approval.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE528151  PR784708>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Spectrum Brands Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 710
Case
[2025] FWCA 710
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Spectrum Brands Australia Pty Ltd was the applicant before the Fair Work Commission, seeking approval of the Spectrum Brands Enterprise Agreement 2025. The application was made under section 230 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement was intended to regulate the terms and conditions of employment for certain employees within the company. The application process involved examining the agreement for compliance with statutory requirements and assessing its overall fairness and balance.

The primary legal issues before the Commission involved verifying the agreement's compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009. This included assessing whether the agreement contained the mandatory minimum terms and conditions as outlined in the Act, whether the agreement had been fairly negotiated, and if the agreement was free from any unfair provisions. Additionally, the Commission had to determine whether the agreement adequately covered all necessary provisions and whether it provided sufficient protections for employees, particularly in terms of wages, hours of work, and other conditions.

The Commission considered the arguments presented by both the applicant and the respondents. After reviewing the evidence, the Commission concluded that the agreement met all statutory requirements. The agreement included all the necessary minimum terms and conditions and was deemed to have been fairly negotiated. The Commission found no provisions in the agreement to be unfair and was satisfied that the agreement provided adequate protections for employees. Consequently, the Commission approved the Spectrum Brands Enterprise Agreement 2025, and the applicant's application was successful.

The Fair Work Commission ordered the approval of the Spectrum Brands Enterprise Agreement 2025, effective from 1 July 2025, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the agreement. The Commission's decision was based on the finding that the agreement complied with all statutory requirements and provided fair and balanced terms for both the employer and the employees. The approval of the agreement ensures that the terms and conditions of employment are legally binding and enforceable under the Fair Work Act 2009.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.