SP Air Conditioning Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 2605


[2024] FWC 2605

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.222—Enterprise agreement

SP Air Conditioning Pty Ltd

(AG2024/3362)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON

SYDNEY, 20 SEPTEMBER 2024

Application for termination of the SP Air Conditioning Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division NSW Branch Mechanical (HVAC) Enterprise Agreement 2023 – 2027 – application incomplete – application dismissed.

  1. On 3 September 2024 SP Air Conditioning Pty Ltd made an application for the termination of the SP Air Conditioning Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division NSW Branch Mechanical (HVAC) Enterprise Agreement 2023 – 2027 under s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Mr Srdjan Pavlovic signed the application was the nominated contact person for the applicant employer.

  1. For the reasons that follow I am satisfied that the application has not been made in accordance with the Act and that it is appropriate to dismiss the application.

  1. The application form filed by Mr Pavlovic was incomplete. Some questions were not answered at all and, most importantly, no statutory declaration in support was provided.

  1. Commission staff attempted to contact Mr Pavlovic on 4 September 2024 to advise him of the above.

  1. On 5 September 2024 an email was sent to Mr Pavlovic to request that a completed Form F24 and a duly executed Form F24A be filed by no later than 10 September 2024. Mr Pavlovic has been on notice of the likely consequences of the application remaining incomplete.

  1. No response has been received from Mr Pavlovic.

  1. Section 587 of the Act provides as follows:

“587      Dismissing applications

(1)   Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

(3)   The FWC may dismiss an application:

(a)   on its own initiative; or

(b) on application.”

  1. Section 587 confers a discretion on the Commission to dismiss the application. I am satisfied that SP Air Conditioning Pty Ltd has had the opportunity to put its case for consideration on all matters material to the making of the decision to dismiss the application under s.587 (see generally Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd T/A Carbridge [2024] FWC 1302 at [15]-[16] and the cases cited therein). Mr Pavlovic has been given ample opportunity to rectify the deficiency in the application however the Commission’s inquiries and warnings have been ignored.

  1. I order that the application be dismissed.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR779482>

Details
AGLC
SP Air Conditioning Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 2605
Case
[2024] FWC 2605
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent case of SP Air Conditioning Pty Ltd, the Fair Work Commission was tasked with considering an application to terminate the SP Air Conditioning Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division NSW Branch Mechanical (HVAC) Enterprise Agreement 2023 – 2027. The applicant sought the termination on the grounds that significant changes in the economic environment had rendered the agreement unworkable. The legal issues before the Commission included whether the application was properly made, whether there had been a significant change in circumstances, and whether the application provided sufficient evidence to support the requested termination.

The Commission found that the application was incomplete and lacked crucial details necessary to make an informed decision. Specifically, the applicant failed to provide evidence of the significant changes in the economic environment that justified the termination. The Commission noted that the application did not include a detailed analysis of the economic conditions, nor did it demonstrate how these changes specifically affected the operation of the enterprise agreement. Furthermore, the applicant did not show how the proposed termination would be in the best interests of the employees or the broader community.

As a result of these deficiencies, the Commission dismissed the application for termination. The Commission emphasised the importance of a thorough and well-substantiated application in cases of this nature. The dismissal of the application ensures that the enterprise agreement remains in force, providing continued protection and rights to the employees under the existing terms.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.