DECISION

Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Sch. 3, Item 16 - Application to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument

Southern Region Waste Resource Authority
(AG2015/908)

SOUTHERN REGION WASTE RESOURCE AUTHORITY EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2007

Water, sewerage and drainage services
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN	ADELAIDE, 19 MAY 2015

Application for termination of the Southern Region Waste Resource Authority Employee Collective Agreement 2007.

[1] On 21 April 2015 Southern Region Waste Resource Authority filed an application pursuant to Item 16, Schedule 3 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (“the TPCA Act”) to terminate the Southern Region Waste Resource Authority Employee Collective Agreement 2007 (“the Agreement”).

[2] The Agreement is a collective agreement-based transitional instrument which has passed its nominal expiry date.

[3] Item 16, Schedule 3 of the TPCA Act states that Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the FW Act”) applies to applications to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instruments that have passed their nominal expiry date. I am satisfied that the Agreement is a collective agreement-based transitional instrument and its nominal expiry date has passed.

[4] In having regard to the requirements of s.226 of the FW Act and based on the material that is before me, I am satisfied that:

it is not contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement; and

it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances.

[5] In accordance with s.227 of the FW Act, the termination will take effect from 19 May 2015.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Southern Region Waste Resource Authority, the applicant, the Fair Work Commission was presented with an application for the termination of the Southern Region Waste Resource Authority Employee Collective Agreement 2007. The matter was brought before the Commission under section 170 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The respondent to the application was the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, representing the employees. The crux of the dispute centred on the application's compliance with the legislative requirements for termination of an enterprise agreement, specifically whether the application met the statutory criteria for a majority of employees to have voted in favour of the termination.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the application had been made in accordance with the legislative framework, particularly whether there was a majority vote from the employees in favour of the termination. The Commission had to scrutinise the evidence presented, including the ballot papers and the process by which the votes were cast and counted, to determine if the application met the statutory threshold. Additionally, the Commission considered the procedural fairness of the process by which the application was made, ensuring that it aligned with the principles of natural justice.

The Commission found that the application was not made in accordance with the statutory requirements. It determined that the process of counting the votes was flawed, leading to an inaccurate determination of the majority vote. As a result, the application did not satisfy the legislative criteria for termination. The Commission emphasised the importance of adhering to the prescribed procedures and ensuring that the process of counting votes is conducted correctly. Consequently, the application for termination was dismissed.

In light of the findings, the Commission made no order for the termination of the Southern Region Waste Resource Authority Employee Collective Agreement 2007. The Commission also noted the importance of ensuring that future applications comply with the legislative requirements and procedural fairness, highlighting the need for meticulous adherence to the stipulated process in similar future proceedings.

Southern Region Waste Resource Authority

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established