DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Limited
(AG2014/8225)

SOUTHERN CROSS ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING LIMITED FAIRVIEW EASTERN FLANK PROJECT AGREEMENT 2014

Building, metal and civil construction industries
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS	BRISBANE, 4 DECEMBER 2014

Application for approval of the Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Limited Fairview Eastern Flank Project Agreement 2014.

[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 18 November 2014 by Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Limited for the approval of a Greenfields agreement known as the Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Limited Fairview Eastern Flank Project Agreement 2014(“the Agreement”).

[2] A statutory declaration was provided by Mr P. Simpson, Divisional Branch Secretary, of the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (“the CEPU”).

[3] In light of this statutory declaration and in accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CEPU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[4] The consultation clause does not conform with s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Regulations is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[6] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Limited sought approval from the Federal Court for the Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Limited Fairview Eastern Flank Project Agreement 2014. The project involved the sale of assets and intellectual property from Southern Cross to a new entity, with the intention of transferring the workforce to the new entity. The application was contested by the Electrical Trades Union of Australia, which argued that the proposed restructuring would lead to adverse employment outcomes for the employees involved. The court was required to determine whether the proposed agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it complied with relevant legislative requirements.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable and whether it met the statutory criteria for approval. The court examined the terms of the agreement, the process by which it was negotiated, and the potential impact on the employees. The Electrical Trades Union of Australia argued that the employees would suffer significant detriments, including the loss of job security and benefits, and that the process was not sufficiently transparent or inclusive. Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Limited contended that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and complied with all relevant legal requirements.

The court found that the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable and met the statutory criteria for approval. The court noted that the agreement provided for the transfer of employees to a new entity under terms that were comparable to their existing employment, and that the process was conducted in good faith. The court also found that the agreement was negotiated through a process that was transparent and inclusive, and that the potential detriments to the employees were outweighed by the benefits of the proposed restructuring. The court therefore granted the application for approval of the agreement.

The final orders of the court included the approval of the Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Limited Fairview Eastern Flank Project Agreement 2014, subject to certain conditions designed to protect the interests of the employees. The court also ordered that the agreement be implemented in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the judgment.

Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Limited

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established