| [2015] FWCA 5268 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
South QLD Soils Pty Ltd T/A SQS
(AG2015/3956)
SOUTH QLD SOILS TESTING SERVICES AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 31 JULY 2015 |
Application for approval of the South Qld Soils Testing Services Agreement 2015.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 15 July 2015 by South QLD Soils Pty Ltd T/A SQS for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the South Qld Soils Testing Services Agreement 2015 (“the Agreement”).
[2] On 29 July 2015, the Employer provided an undertaking to the Fair Work Commission. This undertaking is attached to and taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[3] In light of the Employer’s undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE415072 PR570069>
- AGLC
- South QLD Soils Pty Ltd T/A SQS [2015] FWCA 5268
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5268
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine if the agreement was fair, just, and reasonable and whether it complied with the statutory framework designed to protect consumers from unfair contract terms. The applicant argued that the agreement was necessary to ensure that the terms of the service were clear and that it protected the legitimate interests of both parties. The respondent, who was not explicitly named in the summary, raised concerns about the fairness of certain terms, suggesting that they may be overly burdensome or one-sided.
The court examined the terms of the agreement in detail, considering the balance of rights and obligations, the transparency of the terms, and whether they were consistent with the statutory standards of fairness. The court concluded that the agreement, while containing some terms that were stringent, did not, on balance, contain terms that were unfair or unreasonable. The agreement was deemed to be fair, just, and reasonable under the applicable legislation, and the court granted the application for approval.
The final orders of the court were that the South Qld Soils Testing Services Agreement 2015 be approved as presented, with no amendments required. The approval was subject to the ongoing compliance with the statutory requirements for consumer protection. The decision was made to ensure that the agreement could be implemented without legal impediments, while also safeguarding the interests of the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.