| [2024] FWCA 2250 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.218A - application to vary an agreement to correct or amend errors, defects or irregularities
South Perth Hospital Inc T/A South Perth Hospital
(AG2024/1747)
SOUTH PERTH HOSPITAL REGISTERED NURSES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2022
| Health and welfare services | |
| COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | SYDNEY, 20 JUNE 2024 |
Application for variation of the South Perth Hospital Registered Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2022
South Perth Hospital Inc T/A South Perth Hospital has applied to vary clause 14.3(f) of the South Perth Hospital Registered Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2022[1] (the Agreement) to correct an obvious error in relation to ‘Example 1’ of the accrual of time off in lieu. The proposed variation will ensure that the figures in the example for time off in lieu are consistent with specified overtime rates in the Agreement. The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation does not object to the variation application. The proposed variation is attached at Annexure A.
I am satisfied that clause 14.3(f) of the Agreement is affected by an obvious error. I am satisfied that the proposed variation reflects the agreement reached between the employer and employees. The variation is necessary to provide certainty to the parties and other interested stakeholders about the accurate application of overtime rates and time off in lieu under the Agreement. In the circumstances, it is appropriate to vary the Agreement to correct the errors under section 218A of the Fair Work Act 2009. The variation is approved and will operate from 6 June 2023. A consolidated version of the Agreement as varied is attached to this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A
[1] AE520171; [2023] FWCA 1548.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE520171 PR776113>
- AGLC
- South Perth Hospital Inc T/A South Perth Hospital [2024] FWCA 2250
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 2250
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues that the court needed to address included whether the hospital had followed the necessary procedures in proposing the variations, whether the variations were bona fide attempts to improve efficiency, and whether they were in the best interest of the employees and the hospital. The court also had to consider whether the variations were necessary and whether there were any alternative options available.
The Fair Work Commission determined that the hospital had not followed all the procedural requirements as outlined in the Fair Work Act 2009. The court found that the hospital had failed to adequately consult with the registered nurses, which was a critical step in the process. Furthermore, the court held that the variations were not in the best interest of the employees and the hospital, and that there were alternative options that could have been explored. Based on these findings, the application for variation of the enterprise agreement was dismissed. The court emphasised the importance of proper consultation and adherence to legal requirements in such matters.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.