Sophie Iliopoulos v TLK Partners

Case

[2017] FWC 470

20 JANUARY 2017

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2017] FWC 470
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

REASONS FOR DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Sophie Iliopoulos
v
TLK Partners
(U2016/14927)

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE

SYDNEY, 20 JANUARY 2017

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy.

[1] Today I dismissed the application of Ms Sophie Iliopoulos for an unfair dismissal remedy pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] Ms Iliopoulos has asked for my reasons for decision. They are very straightforward.

[3] In her application Ms Iliopoulos stated that she was employed on 30 May 2016 and dismissed on eight December 2016.

[4] On 13 January 2017 I wrote to Ms Iliopoulos in the following terms:

    “Dear Ms Iliopoulos,

    Re: U2016/14927 – Iliopoulos v TLK Partners

    The respondent submits that it is a small business employer with less than 15 employees. If this is the case an application for an unfair dismissal remedy cannot succeed against it unless the period of employment is greater than 12 months.

    Can you please provide a statement regarding the period of your employment with the respondent and confirm whether it is, to your knowledge, an employer with less than 15 employees.

    Unless you request a hearing in person, by telephone or by video conference, I will decide if the jurisdictional objection lodged bythe respondent is successful and, as a consequence, whether or not your application will proceed to arbitration, on the basis of the application filed by yourself, any response filed by the respondent, and your statement.
    Please provide your statement within 14 days of the date of this letter. If no statement is received I will consider your application on the material before me without further notice to you.

    Yours faithfully,”

[5] In an email dated 18 January 2017 Ms Iliopoulos confirmed that the respondent was a small business and that she was employed for less than the minimum employment period.

[6] The Fair Work Commission does not have jurisdiction to extend a remedy to an employee employed for less than the minimum employment period.

[7] On 20 January 2017 I wrote to Ms Iliopoulos as follows:

    “Dear Ms Iliopoulos,

    Thank you for your correspondence of 18 January 2017. Unfortunately I have no jurisdiction to disregard the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) in relation to the minimum period of employment.

    I therefore have no alternative but to dismiss your application despite the matters set out in your correspondence.

    I wish you luck in your future employment elsewhere.”

[8] On the same date I issued an order and dismissed her application.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR589619>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0