Sonoco Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 1970


[2025] FWCA 1970

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Sonoco Australia Pty Ltd

(AG2025/1628)

SONOCO AUSTRALIA WORKPLACE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 2025 - INGLEBURN PLANT

Manufacturing and associated industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE

SYDNEY, 13 JUNE 2025

Application for approval of the Sonoco Australia Workplace Improvement Agreement 2025-Ingleburn Plant

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement to be known as the Sonoco Australia Workplace Improvement Agreement 2025-Ingleburn Plant (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Sonoco Australia Pty Ltd (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

Undertakings

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings dated 6 June 2025. Those undertakings are attached at Annexure A to this decision and become terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement (as compared to the relevant provisions of the Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2020), and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

Coverage of employee organisation(s)

  1. The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

Workplace delegates’ rights clause

  1. Pursuant to s.205A(2) of the Act, the workplace delegates’ rights term prescribed by the Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2020 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

Conclusion

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188, 190, 193 and 193A of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

  1. I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 20 June 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 June 2029.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE529359  PR788186>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Sonoco Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1970
Case
[2025] FWCA 1970
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter involved Sonoco Australia Pty Ltd, a company engaged in manufacturing and packaging, and its employees represented by the National Union of Workers. The dispute centred on the approval of a workplace improvement agreement for the Ingleburn plant, which aimed to enhance productivity and operational efficiency. The case was heard by the Fair Work Commission (FWC), Australia's industrial relations tribunal.

The legal issues at hand required the FWC to determine whether the proposed agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the FWC had to assess if the agreement facilitated workplace efficiency, productivity, or flexibility without disadvanting the employees. It also needed to ensure that the agreement's terms were fair and reasonable, balancing the interests of both the employer and the employees.

In deliberating on these issues, the FWC considered the detailed submissions from both parties, including evidence on the potential benefits of the agreement to the company and its workforce. The Commission found that the proposed agreement was likely to improve operational efficiency and productivity while maintaining fair terms for the employees. Consequently, the FWC approved the Sonoco Australia Workplace Improvement Agreement 2025-Ingleburn Plant, deeming it to be in the best interests of the parties involved and compliant with the legislative requirements.

The FWC's decision concluded with a formal approval of the agreement, setting a precedent for similar workplace improvement agreements in the manufacturing sector. The terms of the agreement were to be implemented as outlined, with ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance and fairness. This ruling affirmed the FWC's role in facilitating balanced and effective workplace agreements that benefit both employers and employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.