SOMERS& ETTRIDGE

Link copied
Case Copied 13 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SOMERS& ETTRIDGE [2018] FamCA 874

FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – interim applications – where the applicant seeks $14,500 but is unable to identify the head of power upon which he seeks to rely– where the applicant seeks disclosure from the respondent – where orders have already been made in relation to disclosure – issue of disclosure will need to be determined by the trial judge – where the applicant seeks litigation funding – where the litigation funding application must fail in accordance with the provision of s 117 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) – where the respondent proposes that the applicant extend the loan facility against the real property up to $50,000 – order made permitting the applicant to borrow $50,000 against the real property with the sum to be characterised as part property settlement.

FAMILY LAW – INJUNCTIONS – interim injunction made preventing the applicant from dealing with real property and the parties’ self-managed superannuation fund.

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 79, 117
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)
APPLICANT: Mr Somers
RESPONDENT: Ms Ettridge
FILE NUMBER: MLC 11262 of 2015
DATE DELIVERED: 7 September 2018
PLACE DELIVERED: Melbourne
PLACE HEARD: Melbourne
JUDGMENT OF: Johns J
HEARING DATE: 7 September 2018

REPRESENTATION

THE APPLICANT: In Person
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ms Paterson
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Carew Counsel Pty Ltd

Orders

IT IS ORDERED

  1. That except as otherwise provided and until further order, the respondent MR SOMERS be restrained by injunction from doing any act or thing that may cause the property situated at and known as B Street, Suburb C in the State of Victoria being the whole of the land contained in Certificate of title Folio Identifier Volume … Folio … (“the Suburb C property”) to be disposed, of sold, transferred, assigned, leased, further mortgaged or further encumbered in any manner whatsoever.

  2. That until further order, the respondent MR SOMERS be restrained by injunction from further increasing the balance of the F Bank home loan account number ... secured over the Suburb C property, currently in the sum of $124,888.17 (as at 30 June 2018) save for the purpose of borrowing $50,000 so as to meet his costs to obtain legal representation for the purposes of the final hearing scheduled to occur on 23 October 2018, with this sum to be characterised as part property settlement to the respondent and with the respondent to meet all repayments (interest and principal) with respect to those borrowings.

  3. That until further order, the respondent MR SOMERS and/or his servants and/or his agents, be restrained by injunction from withdrawing, disposing of or otherwise dealing with the funds held in F Bank Prime Access Account No. …54, F Bank Account No. …56 held in the name of the G Super Fund and/or any other bank accounts held in the name of the G Super Fund.

  4. That these orders be forthwith served upon F Bank by the applicant.

BY CONSENT IT IS ORDERED

  1. That the respondent

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read SOMERS& ETTRIDGE and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FamCA 874
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Family Court of Australia, Johns J considered interim applications made by the applicant, Mr. Somers, and the respondent, Ms. Ettridge. Mr. Somers sought $14,500, disclosure from Ms. Ettridge despite prior disclosure orders, and litigation funding. Ms. Ettridge proposed that Mr. Somers be permitted to extend a loan facility against their real property up to $50,000.

The court was required to determine the validity of Mr. Somers' applications for disclosure and litigation funding, and to consider Ms. Ettridge's proposal regarding the loan facility. The legal issues also encompassed the appropriate interim orders to be made concerning the parties' real property and superannuation fund.

Johns J reasoned that the issue of disclosure would be determined by the trial judge, and that Mr. Somers' application for litigation funding failed in accordance with section 117 of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The court made orders restraining Mr. Somers from dealing with the real property and the parties' self-managed superannuation fund. Crucially, the court permitted Mr. Somers to borrow $50,000 against the real property, to be characterised as part property settlement, with Mr. Somers to meet all repayments. The court also ordered that Mr. Somers permit a valuer access to inspect the real property.

Orders

Orders of the court

IT IS ORDERED

1.

That except as otherwise provided and until further order, the respondent MR SOMERS be restrained by injunction from doing any act or thing that may cause the property situated at and known as B Street, Suburb C in the State of Victoria being the whole of the land contained in Certificate of title Folio Identifier Volume … Folio … (“the Suburb C property”) to be disposed, of sold, transferred, assigned, leased, further mortgaged or further encumbered in any manner whatsoever.

2.

That until further order, the respondent MR SOMERS be restrained by injunction from further increasing the balance of the F Bank home loan account number ... secured over the Suburb C property, currently in the sum of $124,888.17 (as at 30 June 2018) save for the purpose of borrowing $50,000 so as to meet his costs to obtain legal representation for the purposes of the final hearing scheduled to occur on 23 October 2018, with this sum to be characterised as part property settlement to the respondent and with the respondent to meet all repayments (interest and principal) with respect to those borrowings.

3.

That until further order, the respondent MR SOMERS and/or his servants and/or his agents, be restrained by injunction from withdrawing, disposing of or otherwise dealing with the funds held in F Bank Prime Access Account No. …54, F Bank Account No. …56 held in the name of the G Super Fund and/or any other bank accounts held in the name of the G Super Fund.

4.

That these orders be forthwith served upon F Bank by the applicant.

BY CONSENT IT IS ORDERED

5.

That the respondent MR SOMERS permit Mr H of J Valuers access to inspect the Suburb C property at 10.30am on Friday 14 September 2018.

BY THE COURT IT IS ORDERED

6.

That the Application in a Case filed 28 August 2018 and the Response to Application in a Case filed this day be otherwise dismissed.

7.

That the wife’s costs of this day be reserved to the Trial Judge.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.