Somers and Ettridge (No 2)

Case

[2019] FamCAFC 229

25 November 2019


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SOMERS & ETTRIDGE (NO 2) [2019] FamCAFC 229

FAMILY LAW – APPEAL – WARRANT – REFUSAL OF STAY – Where the appellant does not seek to pursue his appeal and makes no submission in opposition to the appeal being dismissed – Appeal dismissed.

FAMILY LAW – COSTS – Where the respondent seeks her costs on a party/party basis – Where the appeal has been wholly unsuccessful – Where the appellant makes no submission in opposition to an order for costs being made in the terms as sought – Costs ordered in the sum as sought by the respondent.

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
APPELLANT: Mr Somers
RESPONDENT: Ms Ettridge
FILE NUMBER: MLC 11262 of 2015
APPEAL NUMBER: SOA 38 of 2019
DATE DELIVERED: 25 November 2019
PLACE DELIVERED: Melbourne
PLACE HEARD: Melbourne
JUDGMENT OF: Strickland, Aldridge & Kent JJ
HEARING DATE: 25 November 2019
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Family Court of Australia
LOWER COURT JUDGMENT DATE: 2 August 2019
LOWER COURT MNC: [2019] FamCA 520

REPRESENTATION

THE APPELLANT: In Person
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ms Paterson
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Carew Counsel Pty Ltd

Orders

  1. The Notice of Appeal filed on 6 August 2019 be dismissed.

  2. The appellant husband pay the costs of the respondent wife fixed in the sum of $5,898.89.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Somers & Ettridge (No 2) has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

THE FULL COURT OF THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE

Appeal Number: SOA 38 of 2019
File Number: MLC 11262 of 2015

Mr Somers

Appellant

And

Ms Ettridge

Respondent

EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

STRICKLAND J

  1. Before the Court today was the Notice of Appeal filed by Mr Somers (“the appellant”) on 6 August 2019, appealing from orders made by Johns J on 2 August 2019. In addition, there was an Application in an Appeal filed by the appellant on 12 November 2019, seeking an adjournment of the hearing of that appeal.

  2. When the matter was called on today, and after hearing submissions primarily from the appellant, he indicated that he did not wish to pursue the appeal, and further indicated that he had nothing to say in opposition to the appeal being dismissed on that basis. Thus, this Court made an order that the Notice of Appeal be dismissed.

  3. Consequent upon that order, Ms Ettridge (“the respondent”) made an application for costs on the basis of the appeal being dismissed.

  4. As is required, the respondent has filed a schedule of costs on 18 November 2019. The amount was slightly amended today, but the total amount of costs sought was $5,898.89, and those costs we were told were calculated on a party/party basis. The appellant indicated that he had nothing to put to us in opposition to an order for costs being made in the terms sought by the respondent.

  5. In those circumstances, the order of the Court is that the appellant husband pay the costs of the respondent wife fixed in the sum of $5,898.89.

ALDRIDGE J

  1. I agree.

KENT J

  1. I agree.  I would only add that it was clear in the hearing that there was nothing about the appellant’s financial circumstances as would stand in the way of the making of a costs order, it being confirmed he has now received the capital sum from the sale of the property, he says, in the amount of $73,000, and it is clear that the respondent has been wholly successful in these appeal proceedings, and those are reasons supplementary to the reasons given by the presiding judge for making the orders sought.

STRICKLAND J

  1. The formal orders of the Court are:

    (1)The Notice of Appeal filed on 6 August 2019 be dismissed.

    (2)The appellant husband pay the costs of the respondent wife fixed in the sum of $5,898.89.

I certify that the preceding eight (8) paragraphs are a true copy of the ex tempore reasons for judgment of the Honourable Full Court (Strickland, Aldridge & Kent JJ) delivered on 25 November 2019.

Associate:

Date:  28 November 2019

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1