| [2021] FWCA 6258 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Solenis Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2021/7623)
SOLENIS AUSTRALIA LTD (KWINANA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 13 OCTOBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the Solenis Australia Ltd (Kwinana) Enterprise Agreement 2021.
[1] Solenis Australia Pty Ltd (the Applicant) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Solenis Australia Ltd (Kwinana) Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 5 October 2021.
[3] On 5 October 2021, my Chambers sent correspondence to the parties seeking to address concerns with certain aspects of the Agreement and invited the parties to address these matters. The concerns were as follows:
• Additional materials were sought regarding Agreement pre-approval requirements, specifically notice emails sent to employees and emails containing agreement support materials.
• The definition of shiftworker contained at clause 3 of the Agreement and referred to clause 30.1 was inconsistent with NES shiftworker definition at clause 34.2 of the Award.
• Clauses 19.11 regarding withholding NES entitlements, 14.2 regarding maximum weekly hours of work, 14.10 and 14.8 regarding carers’ leave and clauses 15.3 and 19.8 regarding notice of termination were inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES) however the NES precedence term at clause 7.6 is deemed to resolve the above NES inconsistencies identified in the Agreement.
• Better of overall concerns were raised regarding the minimum engagement entitlement for casual employees.
[4] The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 7 October 2021. The undertaking deals with the following topics:
• The definition of a shift worker will be for the purposes of the National Employment Standards (NES).
• The Employer gave an undertaking that on each occasion that a casual employee is required to attend work, the employee must be paid for a minimum of 4 consecutive hours’ work. In order to meet their personal circumstances a casual Employee may request, and the Employer may agree, to an engagement for no less than 3 consecutive hours.
[5] A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representatives did not express any view on the undertaking.
[6] The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[7] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[8] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[9] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 1 August 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE513498 PR734844>
- AGLC
- Solenis Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 6258
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 6258
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the commission included whether the agreement had been made in good faith, whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and if the necessary consultation processes had been followed. Additionally, the commission needed to determine if the agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly in relation to the coverage of the agreement and the rights of employees.
The commission found that the agreement had been made in good faith and provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions. The evidence demonstrated that appropriate consultation processes had been undertaken, and the agreement adequately covered the intended workforce. The commission concluded that the proposed agreement met all legal requirements for approval. Consequently, the application for approval was granted.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Solenis Australia Ltd (Kwinana) Enterprise Agreement 2021, effective from 1 July 2021, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.