[2014] FWCA 1983 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Sokip Pty Ltd
(AG2014/601)
SOKIP PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 24 MARCH 2014 |
Application for approval of the Sokip Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2018.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 18 March 2014 by Sokip Pty Ltd for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Sokip Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2018(“the Agreement”).
[2] The Agreement was not lodged within 14 days after it was made. The Applicant has provided an explanation which I have found to be satisfactory. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b) I consider it fair to extend the time for making this application.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE407398 PR548953>
- AGLC
- Sokip Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1983
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 1983
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were primarily concerned with whether the agreement was made in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it adhered to the principles of procedural fairness. The court had to determine if the applicant had adequately facilitated the negotiation process, ensured fair representation, and provided necessary information to the employees. Furthermore, the court needed to assess whether the agreement appropriately balances the interests of the employer and the employees, without unfairly disadvantaging any party.
In its reasoning, the court examined the process followed by the applicant during the negotiation of the agreement. The court found that the applicant had engaged in good faith negotiations, provided employees with adequate information, and ensured fair representation. The court was satisfied that the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and did not contravene any provisions of the Act. Additionally, the court determined that the agreement was fair and balanced, considering the interests of both the employer and the employees. Consequently, the court approved the Sokip Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018.
The final orders of the court approved the enterprise agreement, subject to certain conditions that were outlined in the decision. The applicant was directed to provide a copy of the approved agreement to the Fair Work Ombudsman and to ensure that all employees were informed of the terms and conditions of the agreement. The applicant was also required to provide ongoing access to the agreement for inspection by the employees and their representatives.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.