Sodhi and Parkhi

Link copied
Case Copied 6 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SODHI & PARKHI [2014] FamCA 498
FAMILY LAW – NULLITY – Where the husband alleges his consent was not proper because of fraud or duress – Application dismissed
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 51
Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) s 23B
Hallas and Kefalos [2012] FamCA 860
Kokl (1981) FLC 91-078
Re S (1980) FLC 90-820
Teves III and Campomayor (1995) FLC 92-578
APPLICANT: Mr Sodhi
RESPONDENT: Ms Parkhi
FILE NUMBER: PAC 453 of 2014
DATE DELIVERED: 19 June 2014
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Foster J
HEARING DATE: 19 June 2014

REPRESENTATION

THE APPLICANT: Self-represented Litigant
THE RESPONDENT: No appearance

Orders

  1. The Application for Declaration of Nullity filed on 4 February 2014 is dismissed.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Sodhi & Parkhi has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA

FILE NUMBER: PAC 453 of 2014

Mr Sodhi

Applicant

And

Ms Parkhi

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. This is an application filed by the husband seeking a declaration of nullity in relation to his marriage to the Respondent wife.  The marriage was solemnised on … August 2013 at Sydney Suburb D, New South Wales, and a certified copy of the marriage certificate has been marked into evidence as Exhibit A.  It appears that the marriage was performed by a celebrant pursuant to the rights of Religious Organisation C.  The marriage was registered on … September 2013. 

  2. The application filed by the husband on 4 February 2014 is supported by an affidavit by the husband filed on the same date.

  3. By way of background, the husband was born in 1980 and is now aged 33 years of age.  The Respondent wife was born in April 1984 and is now 30 years of age. 

  4. During the course of these proceedings service on the Respondent wife, whose whereabouts are not known to the Applicant, was dispensed with and the matter proceeds on an undefended basis. 

  5. The affidavit in support of the application for a declaration of nullity has been prepared by the husband himself and is in handwritten form.  It is of some utility to reproduce the terms of the affidavit in these reasons for Judgment.  In his affidavit the Applicant husband deposes as follows:

    1. This marriage ceremony took place on …/08/13.  I was forced into this marriage by my mum.  I did not give my real consent to the marriage because consent was obtained by duress and fraud.  This was a purely arranged marriage.  I was told by family members back at home that [Ms Parkhi] (respondent) was a descent (sic) person.  [Two days after the marriage ceremony] I found out that [Ms Parkhi] had an affair with her work colleague and continue to have affair.  Her main intention to marry me was to get Australian citizenship.

    2.I obeyed my mum’s wishes because she threatened that if I…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Sodhi and Parkhi and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2014] FamCA 498
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Sodhi and Parkhi*, heard before Foster J, the dispute concerned an application for a declaration of nullity. The specific nature of the underlying dispute leading to this application is not detailed in the provided text.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant was entitled to a declaration that the marriage was null and void. This required the Court to consider the relevant legal grounds for nullity under Australian family law.

Foster J dismissed the application for a declaration of nullity. The reasons for this dismissal are not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the outcome signifies that the Court was not satisfied that the legal threshold for declaring the marriage null and void had been met.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The Application for Declaration of Nullity filed on 4 February 2014 is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.