-
MIS Implants Technologies Ltd v More Group Pty Ltd
[2023] ATMO 118
Citation 1
…oppel does not apply to matters before Commissioner of Patents: see SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8, [33]–[40]. [38] Sky Optical LLC v Golden Cala Trading Est [2023] ATMO 59, [23] (citations omitted).…
-
Sky Optical LLC v Golden Cala Trading Est
[2023] ATMO 59
Citation 2
…ue estoppel does not apply to matters before Commissioner of Patents: see SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8, [33]–[40].…
-
Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health USA Inc v Elanco New Zealand
[2021] FCA 1457
Citation 3
…8] FCA 1358; (1998) 89 FCR 458 SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Speciality Chemicals Water Treatments Ltd [2016] APO 8 Société des Usines Chimiques Rhône-Poulenc v Commissioner of Patents [1958] HCA 27; (1958) 100 CLR 5 Technological Resources Pty Ltd v Tettman [2019] FCA 1889; (2019) 375 ALR 185 United States Gy…
-
SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v BASF Australia Ltd
[2019] FCA 425
Citation 4
(Para 4)
…elegate Dr Steven Barker made on 16 February 2016 (the 785 decision); see SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8; and (b)a decision of that delegate made on 18 October 2016 (the 568 decision); see SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatmen…
-
TCT Group Pty Ltd v Polaris IP Pty Ltd
[2024] APO 5
Citation 5
(Para 8)
…be treated in later decisions by the Commissioner has been elucidated in SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8 (“ SNF ”) in the context of considering matters of estoppel. The relevant passages for present purposes can be found at [50] to [52]: “50. In other w…
-
Nufarm Australia Limited v Corteva Agriscience LLC
[2023] APO 40
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…decide how much weight to give to each.” This quotation is taken from SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8 (“ SNF ”) at 52. This approach is often cited when dealing with considerations of estoppel before the Commissioner.[10] I do note that in SNF the delegat…
-
Crown Melbourne Limited
[2023] APO 3
Citation 7
(Para 9)
…to decide on the application before me. However, I may inform myself of and have regard to an earlier decision by a delegate of the Commissioner. [4] [2016] APO 8 at [30]-[54]. See also Commonwealth of Australia v Snell [2019] FCAFC 57. The specification…
-
Britax Childcare Pty Ltd v HBG IP Holding Pty Limited
[2019] APO 31
Citation 8
(Para 1)
…k of a delegate of the Commissioner of Patents”: see for example SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Speciality Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8 at [73]. This is simply indicative of the role exercised by the Commissioner as an administrative decision-maker ( Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affair…
-
SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v BASF Australia Ltd
[2018] APO 26
Citation 9
(Para 6)
…, the following are of particular interest to the opposed application: · SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8 (the “ 785 decision ”) – this decided the opposition to the grant of a patent on the 2004203785 application (the “ 785 opposition ”); · SNF (Australia…
-
Caterpillar Inc. v ESCO Corporation
[2016] APO 74
Citation 10
(Para 32)
…In SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8, the delegate was faced with a similar situation in that there was an earlier Federal Court decision where certain findings of fact had been made. The delegate stated at paragraph [52]: I consider that I should start wit…
-
SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited
[2016] APO 72
Citation 11
(Para 3)
…led to the Federal Court, but the appeal has not yet been decided.[2] [1] SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8. [2] SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Speciality Chemicals Water Treatments Limited VID 211/2016.…
-
H Lundbeck A/S v Alphapharm Pty Ltd
[2016] APO 45
Citation 12
(Para 3)
…e Court about the same acts, if potentially persuasive, are not binding ( SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8). Given this, and that the alleged acts of exploitation appear factually straightforward (at least prima facie ), I do not consider that there is a s…
-
ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company v Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V
[2016] APO 27
Citation 13
(Para 5)
…filed in the present opposition will assume greater significance."[3] [2] SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8. [3] [2016] APO 8 at [52].…
-
SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited
[2016] APO 22
Citation 14
(Para 1)
…to respond to those submissions. Both parties have filed submissions. [1] SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited [2016] APO 8. Summary of the parties’ submissions…