SMITH v STATE TRAINING BOARD & ANOR
[2022] HCASL 78
P49/2021
This application requires an extension of time to seek leave to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia (Buss P, Murphy and Mitchell JA). The appeal foreshadowed in the application does not give rise to an issue of public importance and has insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal. Accordingly, there is no utility in granting the extension of time.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
S.J Gageler J.S Gleeson 20 April 2022
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Smith v State Training Board and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] HCASL 78
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the application for an extension of time should be approved, considering the criteria set out in the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). The court needed to assess whether the appeal had an issue of public importance or if it had sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal. The court also had to consider whether granting the extension would be in the interests of justice.
The court determined that the appeal did not give rise to an issue of public importance and had insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal. The court found that there was no utility in granting the extension of time. Consequently, the application was dismissed, and the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign and seal an order to that effect. The decision was made on 20 April 2022, by Justices Gageler and Gleeson.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.