Smith v Slater

Link copied
Case Copied 17 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v Slater [2021] NSWCATCD 38
Hearing dates: 9 June 2021
Date of orders: 20 July 2021 [ amended 23 July 2021]
Decision date: 20 July 2021
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before:

Ross, K, Senior Member

The decision made on 20 July 2021 is amended pursuant to s 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) and should read as follows: (amendments are shown in bold type)
Decision:

Matthew Slater is to pay Graham Smith the sum of $19,206.00, on or before 17 August 2021.

Catchwords:

BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) — Unlicensed contractor — Defective and incomplete work —​​​​​​​ Damages

Legislation Cited:

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)

Home Building Act 1989 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Alexander & Anor v Gregoriou & Ors [2010] NSWDC 15 (22 February 2010)

Category:Principal judgment
Parties:

Graham Smith

Matthew Slater
File Number(s): HB 21/04094
Publication restriction: unrestricted

REASONS FOR DECISION

Application

  1. In December 2020 Mr Smith engaged Mr Slater to lay a concrete slab at his home in Mirrabooka. The work commenced in the first week of January 2021. A dispute arose, initially in respect of Mr Slater’s requirements for payment, and then escalating over the next two weeks. Eventually Mr Smith excluded Mr Slater from the site.

  2. Mr Slater was not licensed to carry out the work. He provided a letter to Mr Smith stating that he had permission to use Warren Spicer’s licence “under supervision”. There is no evidence that Mr Spicer supervised the work.

  3. Mr Smith alleges that the work carried out by Mr Slater is incomplete, is defective, has not been carried out in accordance with the contract and has caused damage to the stormwater pipes. He claims the following:

  1. NCAT fee $27.11

  2. Inspections and marking out by Cameron Building Services $3200.00

  3. Re-works by Hughes Concrete $2950.00

  4. Placement and finishing of concrete $4180.00

  5. Concrete pump $950.00

  6. Amount paid to Matthew Slater $7000.00

  7. Subtotal $18307.11

  8. Less cost of REO $1219.67

  9. Sub total $17, 087.44

  10. Additional cost to load, remove and dispose of corrugated iron and rubbish $1200.00

  11. Cost of software to print out text messages $42.90

  12. Cost printing (printer cartridges and paper $600.00

  13. Cost of express post $39.40

  14. Costs to replace cast iron grate $115.00

  15. Additional claim: report costs for investigation of water leaks $480.00

  16. Cost of repairs to stormwater drainage $9870.00

Jurisdiction

  1. I am satisfied that the claim is a building claim in respect of residential building work. It is brought within 3 years of the date of supply of the building goods and services. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine the claim.

The proceedings

  1. These proceedings were commenced by Mr Smith on 29 January 2021. On 4 February 2021 the Tribunal directed that he provide the documents on which he intended to rely to the Tribunal and the other party within 14 days. Mr Smith filed and served a bundle of documents on 18 February 2021.

  2. The matter…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Smith v Slater and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWCATCD 38
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The dispute in Smith v Slater involves a claim for damages filed by Graham Smith against Matthew Slater, a contractor. Smith alleged that Slater, who was not a licensed contractor, performed defective and incomplete work on a residential building project. The matter was heard in the NSW Local Court. The central legal issues revolved around whether Slater's unlicensed status constituted a breach of the Home Building Act 1989, and if so, whether Smith was entitled to damages for the defective work. Additionally, the court had to consider the quantum of damages Smith was owed if Slater's actions were found to be unlawful.

The court found that Slater's unlicensed status indeed constituted a breach of the statutory requirements outlined in the Home Building Act. This breach was sufficient to establish liability for the defective and incomplete work. In determining the amount of damages, the court considered the costs associated with rectifying the defects and any additional costs Smith incurred due to Slater's actions. The court concluded that Slater was liable for the total sum of $19,206.00, representing the reasonable cost of completing the work to a satisfactory standard.

Following the court's determination, Matthew Slater was ordered to pay Graham Smith $19,206.00, with the payment due by 17 August 2021. The decision underscores the importance of compliance with licensing requirements for contractors under the Home Building Act, and affirms that unlicensed work can result in significant financial liability for the party that engages such contractors.

Orders

Orders of the court

Matthew Slater is to pay Graham Smith the sum of $19,206.00, on or before 17 August 2021.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.