Smith v Queensland Community Corrections Board

Link copied
Case Copied 9 min read

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Smith v Queensland Community Corrections Board [2000] QSC 396
PARTIES: ALAN PETER SMITH
(applicant)
v
QUEENSLAND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS BOARD
(respondent)
FILE NO: 8886 of 2000
DIVISION: Trial Division
DELIVERED ON: 3 November 2000
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARING DATE: 26 October 2000
JUDGE: White J
ORDER: Declare that the term of imprisonment of Alan Peter Smith within the meaning of that term in s 175(1)(a)(i)(A) of the Corrective Services Act 1988 (as amended) expires on 25 November 2000.
CATCHWORDS:

CRIMINAL LAW - REMISSIONS - PAROLE - prisoner released on parole with parole order to expire at the end of the original sentence - prisoner also granted remissions - whether parole order expires on date of discharge having regard to grant of remissions.

Corrective Services Act 1988 (Qld), s 122, s 130(e), s 163, s 165, s 175(1)(a)(i)(A), s 183, s 184
Corrective Services Regulations 1989 (Qld), reg 21, reg 22, reg 23, reg 24, reg 25, reg 27, reg 28
Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld), s 4

Kelleher v Parole Board of New South Wales (1984) 156 CLR 364, considered.

COUNSEL: J Davidson for the applicant
A MacSporran for the respondent
SOLICITORS: Lewis Lawyers for the applicant
Walsh Halligan Douglas for the respondent
  1. WHITE J:  The applicant was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment on 2 August 1989.  He was granted remission on his sentence in accordance with s 24 of the Corrective Services Regulations 1989 (“the Regulations”) of 203 days.  His prison sentence calendar shows his discharge date as 25 November 2000.  The applicant was released on parole on 21 August 2000.  The parole order states that it expires on 1 August 2001, 12 years from the date the sentence was imposed.

  1. The applicant contends that his parole order ought to expire on the date of discharge, 25 November 2000, having regard to the grant of remission.

  1. The respondent contends that the applicant’s sentence does not expire until 1 August 2001 and, pursuant to s 175(1)(a)(i)(A) of the Corrective Services Act 1988 (“the Act”), that is the date upon which his parole will expire. That section relevantly provides

“A parole order -
(a)      shall contain requirements that the prisoner -

(i)be under the supervision of a community correctional officer

(A)if the prisoner is a prisoner mentioned in section 165(1)(a) - for such period, that does not go past the end of the prisoner’s term of imprisonment, as is determined by the board making the order …”

  1. The appellant is a person to whom s 175(1)(a)(i)(A) applies because he is the person to whom s 165(1)(a) of the Act applies, being a prisoner serving a term of imprisonment. A parole order may not extend past the end of the prisoner’s term of imprisonment. “Term of imprisonment” is defined in s 10 of the Act to mean

“(a)     the term of a single sentence; or

(b)the unbroken period of imprisonment a person is liable to serve by virtue of a number of sentences, whether ordered to…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Smith v Queensland Community Corrections Board and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2000] QSC 396
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Smith v Queensland Community Corrections Board, the Court was presented with a dispute regarding the expiry date of a prisoner's term of imprisonment under the Corrective Services Act 1988 (Qld). Alan Peter Smith, the appellant, was released on parole under the conditions that his parole order would expire at the end of his original sentence. Smith was also granted remissions for good behaviour and participation in rehabilitation programs. The central issue before the Court was whether the parole order would expire on the date of Smith's discharge, taking into account the remissions he had been granted.

The legal issues that required resolution included the interpretation of the Corrective Services Act 1988 (Qld) and associated regulations, particularly sections 122, 130(e), 163, 165, 175(1)(a)(i)(A), 183, and 184, alongside the Corrective Services Regulations 1989 (Qld) regulations 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, and 28. The Court also needed to consider the implications of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld), section 4, and the precedent set by Kelleher v Parole Board of New South Wales (1984) 156 CLR 364.

The Court held that the term of imprisonment of Alan Peter Smith would expire on 25 November 2000. In reaching this conclusion, the Court considered the statutory provisions and relevant case law. It was determined that the remissions granted to Smith did not affect the date on which his parole order was set to expire. Instead, the parole order was to end on the date of his original sentence's completion. This interpretation aligned with the statutory framework and the broader legislative intent to ensure that parole conditions do not unduly extend the actual term of imprisonment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Declare that the term of imprisonment of Alan Peter Smith within the meaning of that term in s 175(1)(a)(i)(A) of the Corrective Services Act 1988 (as amended) expires on 25 November 2000.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.