CITATION: | Smith v Queensland All Codes Racing Industry Board [2016] QCAT 458 |
PARTIES: | Don Smith |
| v | |
| Queensland All Codes Racing Industry Board (Respondent) | |
APPLICATION NUMBER: | OCR046-16 |
MATTER TYPE: | Occupational regulation matters |
HEARING DATE: | 22 November 2016 |
HEARD AT: | Brisbane |
DECISION OF: | Member Deane |
DELIVERED ON: | 1 December 2016 |
DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
ORDERS MADE: | 1. The decision of the Queensland Racing Disciplinary Board dated 23 March 2016 affirming the original decision is set aside. 2. The Tribunal substitutes its own decision that Don Smith has contravened Australian Harness Racing Rule 193(3). 3. Don Smith must file in the Tribunal one (1) copy and provide to Queensland All Codes Racing Industry Board one (1) copy of any submissions he wishes to rely upon in respect of penalty by 4.00pm on 12 December 2016. 4. Queensland All Codes Racing Industry Board must file in the Tribunal one (1) copy and provide to Don Smith one (1) copy of any submissions it wishes to rely upon in respect of penalty by 4.00pm on 19 December 2016. 5. The issue as to penalty will be determined on the papers unless a party requests an oral hearing not before 4.00pm on 19 December 2016. |
CATCHWORDS: | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS – HARNESS RACING – whether trainer contravened Australian Harness Racing Rule 193(3) by administering ‘medication’ on race day – where TCO2 measurements elevated but not so high as to be a prohibited substance - whether horse received an alkalising agent on race day – where significant conflicting expert evidence - where trainer admitted administering a supplement on race day prior to the race Racing Act 2002 (Qld), s 152 A |
APPEARANCES: | |
APPLICANT: | Don Smith |
RESPONDENT: | Queensland All Codes Racing Industry Board |
REPRESENTATIVES: | |
APPLICANT: | represented by Mr S. Neaves of Counsel |
RESPONDENT: | represented by Mr A. James instructed by Fowler Lawyers |
REASONS FOR DECISION
Mr Smith was the trainer of the standard bred, ‘A Good Chance’, on 16 May 2015 when it competed at Albion Park and finished third. A pre-race blood sample was taken and analysed. The sample showed total plasma carbon dioxide (TCO2) concentration of 36.0 mmol/L and the reserve sample showed 35.5 mmol/L. An elevated level of CO2 may enhance the racing performance of a horse by delaying the onset of fatigue and therefore improve its endurance. Excessive levels may harm the horse’s health.
The Stewards conducted an inquiry at which they:
a)charged Mr Smith with a breach of rule 193(3) of the Australian Harness Racing (AHR) Rules contending that he administered or allowed or caused to be administered medication, meaning a treatment with drugs or any other substances, on race day;
b)found Mr Smith had breached AHR Rule 193(3) on the evidence before them despite Mr Smith ‘pleading not guilty’
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Smith v Queensland All Codes Racing Industry Board and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] QCAT 458
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether Smith had contravened Australian Harness Racing Rule 193(3) by administering a supplement on race day. The tribunal had to consider conflicting expert evidence regarding whether the supplement constituted an alkalising agent and whether it was a prohibited substance. The tribunal found that Smith had admitted to administering a supplement on race day prior to the race, and while the TCO2 measurements were elevated, they did not reach the threshold to be considered a prohibited substance. However, the tribunal concluded that the administration of the supplement constituted a breach of the rule.
The tribunal set aside the decision of the Queensland Racing Disciplinary Board and substituted its own decision. It found that Smith had contravened Australian Harness Racing Rule 193(3) by administering a supplement on race day. The tribunal ordered that Smith must file submissions regarding the penalty by a specified date, and the Board must do the same. The tribunal also provided that the issue of penalty would be determined on the papers unless a party requested an oral hearing by a specified date.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The decision of the Queensland Racing Disciplinary Board dated 23 March 2016 affirming the original decision is set aside.
2. The Tribunal substitutes its own decision that Don Smith has contravened Australian Harness Racing Rule 193(3).
3. Don Smith must file in the Tribunal one (1) copy and provide to Queensland All Codes Racing Industry Board one (1) copy of any submissions he wishes to rely upon in respect of penalty by 4.00pm on 12 December 2016.
4. Queensland All Codes Racing Industry Board must file in the Tribunal one (1) copy and provide to Don Smith one (1) copy of any submissions it wishes to rely upon in respect of penalty by 4.00pm on 19 December 2016.
5. The issue as to penalty will be determined on the papers unless a party requests an oral hearing not before 4.00pm on 19 December 2016.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.