Smith v Commonwealth of Australia; Smith v Commonwealth of Austrlia
[1992] HCATrans 318
..
' 'I
• ----~:r
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No Sl99 of 1988 B e t w e e n -
WILLIAM ERROL SMITH
Applicant
and
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S37 of 1992 B e t w e e n -
MARGARET ELLEN SMITH
Applicant
and
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent
Summons to amend writ and for remitter
GAUDRON J
(In Chambers)
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT SYDNEY ON THURSDAY, 29 OCTOBER 1992, AT 9.33 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
| Smith | 1 | 29/10/92 |
| MR V. DOMINELLO: | I appear for the applicant, Your Honour. |
(instructed by Maurice May & Co)
| MR C. KTENAS: | May it please the Court, I appear for the |
defendant. (instructed by the Australian
Government Solicitor)
| HER HONOUR: | That is in the matter of William Errol Smith, |
is it?
MR KTENAS: That is right, Your Honour.
| HER HONOUR: | And is it convenient to hear the matter of |
Margaret Ellen Smith at the same time?
| MR DOMINELLO: | Yes, it is, Your Honour. |
| MR KTENAS: | Yes, it is, Your Honour. |
| HER HONOUR: | And the appearances are the same? |
| MR KTENAS: | Yes, Your Honour. |
| HER HONOUR: | Mr Dominello, you are the applicant, are you? |
| MR DOMINELLO: | Yes, I am, Your Honour. |
| HER HONOUR: | Thank you. |
| MR DOMINELLO: | Your Honour, I rely on the summons. |
| HER HONOUR: | I hope you rely on the affidavit. |
| MR DOMINELLO: | Sorry, on the affidavits sworn by myself on |
30 September. This is essentially an application
to substitute the estate and to also have the
matter remitted to the Federal Court.Unfortunately, it came to my attention fairly late in the piece that if you look at the will fairly
closely, Margaret Ellen Smith is not the actual executrix; she is a life tenant. Now, I have a copy of the will that has been typed out, if you
would care to read it?
| HER HONOUR: | Yes, thank you. | There has been no grant of |
probate?
| MR DOMINELLO: | No. |
HER HONOUR: There is no real estate involved?
MR DOMINELLO: There is no real estate, however, there would
be property in the sense that there is litigation.
| HER HONOUR: | Yes. | Has there been contact with the other |
named beneficiaries?
| Smith | 2 | 29/10/92 |
| MR DOMINELLO: | I have contacted William L. Smith who is the |
youngest son
| HER HONOUR: | "William N" - - -? |
| MR DOMINELLO: | And all of the children are above the age of |
21. Sorry, Wayne William Smith is 34. Rhonda Mary is 40 and Diana Lee is 42 years of age.
| HER HONOUR: | When was the death? |
| MR DOMINELLO: | The death was in - |
| HER HONOUR: | 30 May 1990. |
| MR DOMINELLO: | Yes. |
| HER HONOUR: | Is there anything from the children on the |
file? Is there any affidavit or consent?
| MR DOMINELLO: | No, there is not. |
HER HONOUR: Well, you have a problem, have you not?
| MR DOMINELLO: | I believe so, Your Honour. |
| HER HONOUR: | And what do you propose to do about it? |
| MR DOMINELLO: | As I saw the problem, I was hoping that we |
could stand the matter over, or perhaps we could
remit -
| HER HONOUR: | No. |
| MR DOMINELLO: | If we may remit the matter down, if that is |
not possible, well, if we could stand the matter
over, say, for three weeks.
| HER HONOUR: | I think the preferable course would be for me |
to indicate - and I take it there is no objection
to any of the orders sought?
| MR KTENAS: | No, Your Honour. |
| HER HONOUR: | That on the presentation to this Court of the |
witnessed consents of the children of the deceased
plaintiff to the matter proceeding in the name of
Margaret Ellen Smith as legal personal
representative of the estate of William Errol
Smith, an order will be made substituting the said
Margaret Ellen Smith as legal personal
representative of William Errol Smith as the
plaintiff in the action and orders will then also
be made by consent remitting the matter of WilliamErrol Smith and of Margaret Ellen Smith v The
Commonwealth to the Federal Court in accordance
| Smith | 3 | 29/10/92 |
with the draft orders on the file. Would that be satisfactory?
| MR DOMINELLO: | Yes, Your Honour. |
| HER HONOUR: | Now, what about costs of today? | Does anything |
turn on those?
| MR KTENAS: | No, Your Honour. | Costs could be costs in the |
cause.
| HER HONOUR: | Yes. | Do you agree to that? |
| MR DOMINELLO: | Yes, I do, Your Honour. |
| HER HONOUR: | Yes. Costs of today's applications will be |
costs in the cause.
I should indicate, Mr Dominello, I would
expect that to be forthcoming within at least 10
days. Is there any difficulty about that? If
there is, you should tell me now.
| MR DOMINELLO: | The only difficulty, Your Honour, is that |
they reside in Western Australia so we would be at
the hands of Australia Post.
| HER HONOUR: | Yes. | I will indicate that I will expect the |
paperwork, then, to be completed within 21 days.
| MR DOMINELLO: | Thank you, Your Honour. |
| HER HONOUR: | I did indicate that I wished their consents to |
be witnessed. It does not have to be done in any formal way but you will attend to that in an
appropriate way?
| MR DOMINELLO: | Yes, Your Honour. |
| HER HONOUR: Very well. Anything else, Mr Registrar? | |
| DEPUTY REGISTRAR: | No, Your Honour. |
| HER HONOUR: | The Court will now adjourn. |
AT 9.39 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE
| Smith | 4 | 29/10/92 |
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Constitutional Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Consent
-
Remedies
-
Standing
-
Procedural Fairness
0
0
0