Sloan & Anor v Weir & Gregcarbil Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 17 min read

LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Sloan & Anor v Weir & Gregcarbil Pty Ltd  [2009] QLC 0183
PARTIES: Barry W and Emma L Sloan
(applicants)
v.

Kelven John Weir and Gregcarbil Pty Ltd
(respondents)

FILE NO: MRA1320-08 (formerly MLC0113-08)
DIVISION: General Division
PROCEEDING: Application for compensation for renewal of mining lease
DELIVERED ON: 24 December 2009
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD AT: Written submissions
PRESIDENT: Mrs CAC MacDonald
ORDERS:

1.    Compensation is determined in the sum of Five Thousand , Five Hundred Dollars ($5,500). 

2.    The respondents are ordered to pay Two Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars ($2,200) to the applicant within one month of the date of this decision.

3.    The respondents are ordered to pay the balance compensation of Three Thousand, Three Hundred Dollars ($3,300) to the applicants by three instalments of One Thousand, One Hundred Dollars ($1,100) each, on or before 1 July 2010, 1 July 2011 and 1 July 2012.

CATCHWORDS: Mining lease renewal – compensation – claim for loss of value of land by landowners – claim allowed in part – effect of surrender of lease.
  1. This is an application by Barry William and Emma Louise Sloan for a determination of compensation under the provisions of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (the Act) in respect of the renewal of Mining Lease 70211.  The respondents to this application are Kelven John Weir and Gregcarbil Pty Ltd who are the holders of Mining Lease 70211.  The mining lease was previously held by Mr Weir and Mr MW Bayly.  Mr Bayly's share in the lease was transferred to Gregcarbil Pty Ltd on 8 August 2008 and, consequently, the claim for compensation has proceeded against Gregcarbil in lieu of Mr Bayly.

  2. With the consent of the parties, this matter has been dealt with on the papers. 

  3. Mining Lease 70211 expired on 30 June 2008.  The respondents have applied for a renewal of that lease for a period of five years.  The lease partially covers Lot 63 on PT 358 in the County of Plantagenet, Parish of Anakie, which is owned by the applicants.  Part of Lot 63 is also subject to access to the lease.  The balance of Mining Lease 70211 partially covers Lot 5 on CLM 597 GHPL 37/3210A County of Clermont, Parish of Keilambete and is the subject of a separate application for compensation by the owner of that property, Rodney Keith Barrett.  The Court's determination of the compensation payable to Mr Barrett is dealt with in a separate decision.

  4. The lease has an area of 71.2743 ha and was granted for the purpose of mining silver ore, gold, diamond, lead ore, sapphire and zircon and to establish a tailings/settling dam and treatment plant/mill site.  The applicants' land is used for the purpose of grazing.

  5. Section 279(1)(a) of the Act provides that a mining lease shall not be renewed unless compensation has been determined (whether by agreement or determination of the Land Court).  As the parties have not reached agreement as to the amount of compensation payable in respect…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Sloan & Anor v Weir & Gregcarbil Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2009] QLC 183
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Sloan and another party brought a case against Weir and Gregcarbil Pty Ltd concerning the renewal of a mining lease and the associated compensation for the loss of value of land. The dispute was heard and determined by the court.

The legal issues that the court had to decide revolved around the amount of compensation due to the landowners for the loss of value of their land. The court was required to determine the appropriate compensation, the timing of payment, and the effect of the surrender of the lease on the compensation claim.

The court found that the claimants were entitled to compensation for the loss of value of their land due to the mining lease. However, the amount of compensation was subject to the surrender of the lease. The court determined that the appropriate compensation was $5,500. The respondents were ordered to pay $2,200 within one month of the decision. The remaining balance of $3,300 was to be paid in three instalments of $1,100 each, on or before 1 July 2010, 1 July 2011 and 1 July 2012.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Compensation is determined in the sum of Five Thousand , Five Hundred Dollars ($5,500).

2. The respondents are ordered to pay Two Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars ($2,200) to the applicant within one month of the date of this decision.

3. The respondents are ordered to pay the balance compensation of Three Thousand, Three Hundred Dollars ($3,300) to the applicants by three instalments of One Thousand, One Hundred Dollars ($1,100) each, on or before 1 July 2010, 1 July 2011 and 1 July 2012.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.