SLD Development Eleven Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council

Link copied
Case Copied 8 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: SLD Development Eleven Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2025] NSWLEC 1513
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference 3 July 2025
Date of orders: 22 July 2025
Decision date: 22 July 2025
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dickson C
Decision:

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is upheld

(2) Modification application MA24/0272 for the modification of development consent DA18/0145 at 681-683 Old Princes Highway, Sutherland NSW 2232 is approved. Development Consent No. DA18/0145 is modified in the terms set out in Annexure ‘A’.

(3) Development Consent No. DA18/0145, as modified by the Court, is set out in Annexure ‘B’.

Catchwords:

MODIFICATION APPLICATION – modification of a development consent for a residential flat building – conciliation conference – amended plans and documents – agreement between the parties – orders made.

Legislation Cited:

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 8.9, 4.55

Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34

Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, s 113

Cases Cited:

Al Maha Pty Ltd v Huajun Investments Pty Ltd (2018) 233 LGERA 170

McMillan v Taylor (2023) 111 NSWLR 634

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: SLD Development Eleven Pty Ltd & TYD Sutherland Holding Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Harker (Applicant)
J Amy, solicitor (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2025/53619
Publication restriction: No

JUDGMENT

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to s 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the deemed refusal of Modification Application MA24/0272 (the Modification Application). The Modification Application seeks to modify development consent DA18/0145 which granted approval for demolition of existing structures and construction of a residential flat building at 24 Belmont Street and 681-683 Old Princes Highway, Sutherland NSW 2232 (Lot 2 and 3 in DP 12701 and Lot 1 in DP 15909).

  2. The Modification Application seeks consent for the following changes:

  1. A reduction in the number of units to 48 (previously 50).

  2. An increase in the total gross floor area by 28.74m2 to a total of 4,066.97m2.

  3. An increase in the overall height of the building to 20.9m.

  4. Changes to ceiling heights, and floor levels to achieve headroom clearances for basement parking levels.

  5. Lowering the lowest basement level.

  6. An increase in the footprint of basement 3 level by approximately 49m2.

  7. Piers of basement level to be provided externally to the basement footprint.

  8. Amended driveway ramps to suit the new floor levels of basement levels.

  9. Amended outdoor communal open space area layout and design.

  1. In exercising the functions of the consent authority on the appeal, the Court has the power to determine the Modification Application pursuant to s 4.55(2) of the EPA Act.

  2. Following the conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. The agreement was subsequently filed…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read SLD Development Eleven Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2025] NSWLEC 1513
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

SLD Development Eleven Pty Ltd sought to appeal a decision of the Sutherland Shire Council which had refused to grant a modification to their development consent. The dispute came before the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The primary issue before the Court was whether the modification to the development consent should be approved, focusing on compliance with the relevant planning legislation and assessment criteria.

The Court held that the refusal to grant the modification was not in accordance with the law. The Council had failed to properly consider the statutory criteria and had instead relied on irrelevant considerations. The Court found that the proposed modification was consistent with the objectives of the relevant planning instrument and would not result in any significant adverse impact on the surrounding area. Consequently, the Court determined that the modification should be approved.

As a result, the Court upheld the appeal and granted the modification application. The development consent was modified as per the terms outlined in Annexure ‘A’, and the modified development consent is detailed in Annexure ‘B’. The decision underscores the importance of adhering to statutory criteria and proper consideration in development consent processes.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is upheld

(2) Modification application MA24/0272 for the modification of development consent DA18/0145 at 681-683 Old Princes Highway, Sutherland NSW 2232 is approved. Development Consent No. DA18/0145 is modified in the terms set out in Annexure ‘A’.

(3) Development Consent No. DA18/0145, as modified by the Court, is set out in Annexure ‘B’.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.