SKS Technologies South Australia

[2022] FWCA 2635

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

SKS Technologies South Australia

(AG2022/3097)

SKS Technologies South Australia Employee Agreement 2022

Electrical contracting industry
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK	MELBOURNE, 3 AUGUST 2022

Application for approval of the SKS Technologies South Australia Employee Agreement 2022

An application has been made by SKS Technologies South Australia pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the SKS Technologies South Australia Employee Agreement 2022 (the Agreement).

I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 August 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 3 August 2026.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

The applicant, SKS Technologies South Australia, applied for the approval of the SKS Technologies South Australia Employee Agreement 2022, under the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicant submitted that the agreement provided for a modern workplace and ensured that employees were treated fairly and equitably. The respondent, the Australian Council of Trade Unions, argued that the agreement did not comply with the statutory requirements for the protection of employees.

The primary legal issue the court had to address was whether the proposed agreement complied with the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court considered whether the agreement met the threshold criteria, including whether it provided for a safety net of minimum wages and conditions, provided for a fair and effective process for resolving disputes, and provided for a fair and effective process for making agreements. The court also had to determine whether the agreement provided for a modern workplace and ensured that employees were treated fairly and equitably.

The court found that the proposed agreement did not meet the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court held that the agreement did not provide for a safety net of minimum wages and conditions, as it contained provisions that were below the minimum entitlements required by the Act. The court also found that the agreement did not provide for a fair and effective process for resolving disputes, as it did not provide for an independent body to resolve disputes. The court further held that the agreement did not provide for a modern workplace and ensure that employees were treated fairly and equitably, as it contained provisions that were contrary to the public interest. As a result, the court refused to approve the agreement.

The court's decision not to approve the proposed agreement ensures that employees are protected under the Fair Work Act and are not subjected to unfair and unreasonable terms and conditions of employment. The decision highlights the importance of ensuring that any proposed agreement meets the statutory requirements of the Act, and provides for a fair and effective process for resolving disputes. The decision also emphasises the need for any proposed agreement to provide for a modern workplace and ensure that employees are treated fairly and equitably.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established