| [2017] FWCA 1462 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Skout Solutions Pty Ltd
(AG2016/8042)
SKOUT SOLUTIONS INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 14 MARCH 2017 |
Application for approval of the Skout Solutions Industrial Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Skout Solutions Industrial Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Skout Solutions Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 14 March 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 21 March 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 March 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE423659 PR590978>
- AGLC
- Skout Solutions Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 1462
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 1462
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable process for resolving disputes between the employer and employees. Additionally, the Commission needed to assess if the agreement contained terms that were consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act, such as ensuring a minimum rate of pay and reasonable working hours. The fairness and reasonableness of the dispute resolution process was a pivotal point of contention in the arguments presented.
The Commission found that the dispute resolution process outlined in the agreement was fair and reasonable. It allowed for a structured approach to resolving conflicts, including the possibility of mediation and conciliation. The Commission also noted that the terms of the agreement were consistent with the minimum standards prescribed by the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, finding that it provided for the protection of employees' rights and interests. The approval was granted, affirming the agreement as compliant with the relevant legislative requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.