SJDC PRODUCE PTY LTD (Migration)

Case

[2022] AATA 2235

1 July 2022


SJDC PRODUCE PTY LTD (Migration) [2022] AATA 2235 (1 July 2022)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  SJDC PRODUCE PTY LTD

REPRESENTATIVE:  Mr NISHANT MALIK (MARN: 0640566)

CASE NUMBER:  1905058

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2017/2740701

MEMBER:Karen McNamara

DATE:1 July 2022

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

Statement made on 01 July 2022 at 2:26pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – application for approval of nomination of position – no appearance at hearing – application for review dismissed – no application for reinstatement – dismissal confirmed – decision under review affirmed

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 362B(1A)(b), 362C(5)
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 5.19

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to approve a nomination under reg 5.19 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).

  2. On 15 June 2022 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s 362B(1A)(b) of the Act as the review applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.

  3. The review applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s 362C(5). The review applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.

  4. As the review applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.

    DECISION

  5. The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

    Karen McNamara
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Immigration

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0