SIXTH SENSE FOOD PTY LTD (Migration)

Case

[2021] AATA 4876

11 November 2021


SIXTH SENSE FOOD PTY LTD (Migration) [2021] AATA 4876 (11 November 2021)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  SIXTH SENSE FOOD PTY LTD

CASE NUMBER:  2101197

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2019/457507

MEMBER:Amanda Mendes Da Costa

DATE:11 November 2021

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision under review to refuse the nomination.

Statement made on 11 November 2021 at 1.50pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION nomination –applicant failed to provide the information within the prescribed period – applicant has not provided it with any current or up-to-date information about the operation of its business – not satisfied that the applicant is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia – decision under review affirmed

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 245AR, 359, 360, 363
Migration Regulations 1994, rr 5.19

CASES

Hasran v MIAC [2010] FCAFC 40
Huo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 617
Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 915
Manna v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FMCA 28
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 9 September 2019 to reject the applicant’s application for approval of the nomination of a position under reg 5.19 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).

  2. The applicant applied for approval on 13 February 2019. The requirements for the approval of the nomination of a position in Australia are found in reg 5.19 of the Regulations, which contains general requirements for approval and additional requirements for approval set out in three alternative streams: a Temporary Residence Transition stream, a Direct Entry stream and a Labour Agreement stream. If the application meets the requirements for approval then the application must be approved: reg 5.19(3)(a). If any of the requirements are not met then the application must be refused: reg 5.19(3)(b).

  3. The delegate refused the application on the basis the applicant’s nomination did not satisfy reg 5.19(4)(b) of the Regulations because there was adverse information known to Immigration about the applicant and it was not reasonable to disregard any such information. The delegate found that on 17 August 2018, under s.140M of the Act the applicant was barred by the Department from sponsoring more people under the terms of the approved Standard Business Sponsorship. The bar commenced on 17 August 2018 and remained in force until 17 August 2020.

  4. The matter is now before the Tribunal following orders made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (FCCA) on 28 January 2021.  Those orders included a writ in the nature of certiorari issue, quashing the decision of this Tribunal (differently constituted) dated 7 August 2020 in Tribunal Case Number (TCN) 1927320.  The Court further ordered that a writ in the nature of mandamus issue, remitting the matter to the Tribunal for determination according to law.

  5. The applicant was represented in relation to the review by its registered migration agent.

  6. On 17 September 2021 the Tribunal wrote to the applicant pursuant to s.359(2) of the Act, inviting it to provide information about whether it met the requirements of reg 5.19 of the Regulations, in writing

  7. The invitation was sent to the last address provided in connection with the review and advised that, if the information was not provided in writing by 1 October 2021, the Tribunal may make a decision on the review without taking further steps to obtain the information and the applicant would lose any entitlement it might otherwise have had under the Act to appear before the Tribunal to give evidence and present arguments.

  8. On 20 September 2021 the applicant’s migration agent telephoned the Tribunal to enquire to what case the TCN 2101197 pertains as he was not familiar with this number.  The Tribunal advised him that the TCN 2101197 is the new number for the applicant’s review application following its remittal from the FCCA to the Tribunal.  The applicant’s migration agent told the Tribunal that he understood this information.

  9. The applicant has not provided the information requested within the prescribed period and no extension has either been sought or granted.  In these circumstances s.359C applies and pursuant to s.360(3) the applicant is not entitled to appear before the Tribunal.  The effect of s.363A of the Act is that if an applicant has no entitlement to a hearing, the Tribunal has no power to permit him or her to appear: Hasran v MIAC [2010] FCAFC 40.

  10. Nor has the applicant requested additional time to provide evidence and present arguments, relating to the review application.

  11. Although the applicant has not requested this, the Tribunal has also considered whether it would be appropriate to adjourn the application for review under s.363(1)(b) of the Act to allow the applicant additional time in which to provide evidence to support its application for review.

  12. In doing so, the Tribunal has taken into account the decisions in Huo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 617 and Manna v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2014] FMCA 28, where the Courts have held that the Tribunal is not required to indefinitely defer its decision-making processes. It has also had regard to the decision in Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 regarding the reasonableness of any request for an adjournment, and the Full Federal Court decision in Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1, which considered this issue, as well as the decision in Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 915 where analogous issues were discussed.

  13. The applicant has not provided the information invited to be provided, within the prescribed period set for this purpose.

  14. The Tribunal has taken into account the fact that the applicant has been aware since the delegate’s decision on 9 September 2019 of the reasons for the nomination application and has also been aware that the decision of the Tribunal on 7 August 2020  had been quashed by the FCCA on 28 January 2021 and remitted to the Tribunal for determination.  The Tribunal further notes that the applicant has had the benefit of representation from a registered migration agent in order to assist with this application.

  15. The Tribunal considers it reasonable to expect that the applicant’s representative, as a registered migration agent, has an understanding of the requirements of the legislation and the consequences of not providing the information requested in the invitation the Tribunal sent.  The Tribunal has also taken into account the implications of not providing the information requested in the invitation from the Tribunal were set out in the letter of 17 September 2021.

  16. In these circumstances, the Tribunal considers that the applicant has had sufficient time in which to provide information addressing the central issues arising in the application for review, or in which to request an extension of time in order to provide that information but has not either provided the information or requested an extension of time. Accordingly, the Tribunal has decided not to exercise its discretion under s.363(1)(b) of the Act to adjourn the review any further to allow the applicant more time in which to demonstrate that it meets the relevant criteria under reg 5.19.

  17. In making its decision, the Tribunal has considered the information in both the files of the Department and the Tribunal.     

  18. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has decided to affirm the decision under review to refuse the nomination.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  19. The issue in this case is whether the applicant meets the general requirements for approval of the nomination set out in reg 5.19(4) and the stream specific requirements set out in reg 5.19(5), which are extracted in the attachment to this decision. For the nomination to be approved, all the requirements must be met.

    Status of the nominator – reg 5.19(5)(h)

  20. Regulation 5.19(5)(h) requires that the nominator was the standard business sponsor who last identified the identified person in a nomination approved under s 140GB of the Act and is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia.

  21. The Tribunal notes that the applicant has not provided it with any current or up-to-date information about the operation of its business.  Based on the evidence before it, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia.

  22. Based on the above findings, the Tribunal is not satisfied that reg 5.19(5)(h) is met.

  23. Given the Tribunal has found that the applicant does not meet one of the criteria for the approval of the nomination application, the Tribunal does not consider it necessary to consider the remaining criteria.

  24. For these reasons the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets the requirements of reg 5.19. Accordingly, reg 5.19(3)(b) requires that the nomination must be refused. The decision under review must be affirmed.

    DECISION

  25. The Tribunal affirms the decision under review to refuse the nomination.

    Amanda Mendes Da Costa
    Member


    ATTACHMENT – EXTRACTS FROM THE MIGRATION REGULATIONS 1994

    5.19Approval of nominated positions—Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa and Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa

    Application

    (1)A person (the nominator) (including a partnership or unincorporated association) may apply to the Minister for approval of the nomination of a position in Australia.

    (2)The application must:

    (a)be made in accordance with approved form 1395 (Internet); and

    (b)identify the position; and

    (c)identify a person (the identified person) in relation to the position; and

    (d)identify an occupation in relation to the position; and

    (e)identify the subclass and stream to which the nomination relates, which must be one of the following:

    (i)a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Temporary Residence Transition stream;

    (ii)a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa in the Temporary Residence Transition stream;

    (iii)a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Direct Entry stream;

    (iv)Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa in the Direct Entry stream;

    (v)a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Labour Agreement stream; and

    (f)be accompanied by the fee mentioned in regulation 5.37; and

    (fa)be accompanied by any nomination training contribution charge the nominator is liable to pay in relation to the nomination; and

    (fb)identify the annual turnover (within the meaning of the Migration (Skilling Australians Fund) Charges Regulations 2018) for the nomination; and

    (g)include a written certification by the nominator stating whether or not the nominator has engaged in conduct, in relation to the nomination, that constitutes a contravention of subsection 245AR(1) of the Act.

    Approval of nomination

    (3)The Minister must, in writing:

    (a)approve the nomination if the Minister is satisfied that the requirements set out in subregulation (4) are met; or

    (b)otherwise—refuse to approve the nomination.

    Requirements for approval—general

    (4)The requirements to be met for the nomination to be approved are as follows:

    (a)the application is made in accordance with subregulation (2);

    (b)either:

    (i)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator; or

    (ii)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator;

    (c)if it is mandatory, in the State or Territory in which the position is located, for a person to:

    (i)hold a licence of a particular kind; or

    (ii)hold registration of a particular kind; or

    (iii)be a member (or a member of a particular kind) of a particular professional body;

    to perform tasks of the kind to be performed in the occupation, the identified person is, or is eligible to become, the holder of the licence, the holder of the registration, or a member of the body, at the time of application;

    (d)the nominator has a satisfactory record of compliance with the laws of the Commonwealth, and of each State or Territory in which the nominator operates a business and employs employees in the business, relating to employment;

    (da)any debt due by the nominator as mentioned in section 140ZO of the Act (recovery of nomination training contribution charge and late payment penalty) has been paid in full;

    (e)if the nomination relates to a visa in a Temporary Residence Transition stream—the requirements set out in subregulation (5) are met;

    (f)if the nomination relates to a visa in a Direct Entry stream—the requirements set out in subregulation (9) are met;

    (g)if the nomination relates to a visa in a Labour Agreement stream—the requirements set out in subregulation (14) are met.

    Temporary Residence Transition stream—additional requirements for approval

    (5)If the nomination relates to a visa in a Temporary Residence Transition stream, the following requirements must also be met:

    (a)at the time the application is made, the identified person holds:

    (i)a Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa granted on the basis that the person satisfied the criterion in subclause 457.223(4) of Schedule 2 as in force before 18 March 2018; or

    (ii)a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Medium‑term stream; or

    (iii)for a person specified in a legislative instrument made by the Minister for the purposes of this subparagraph—a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short‑term stream; or

    (iv)if the last substantive visa held by the identified person was a visa mentioned in subparagraph (i), (ii) or (iii)—a bridging visa granted on the basis that the person is an applicant for a visa mentioned in subparagraph (i) or (ii); or

    (v)if the last substantive visa held by the identified person was a visa mentioned in subparagraph (i), (ii) or (iii)—for a person specified in a legislative instrument made under subparagraph (iii), a bridging visa granted on the basis that the person is an applicant for a visa mentioned in subparagraph (iii); or

    (vi)if the last substantive visa held by the identified person was a visa mentioned in subparagraph (i), (ii) or (iii)—a bridging visa granted on the basis that the person is an applicant for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa or a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa;

    (b)the occupation:

    (i)is listed in ANZSCO; and

    (ii)has the same 4‑digit ANZSCO occupation unit group code as the occupation in relation to which the identified person’s most recently held Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa or Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa was granted;

    (c)unless a legislative instrument made under subregulation (8) exempts the identified person from the operation of this paragraph—the occupation must:

    (i)be an occupation specified in an instrument made under subregulation (8) and in force at the time the application is made; and

    (ii)apply to the identified person in accordance with an instrument made under that subregulation;

    (d)either:

    (i)there is no information known to Immigration that indicates that the identified person is not genuinely performing the tasks of the occupation as specified in ANZSCO; or

    (ii)it is reasonable to disregard any such information;

    (e)during the period of 4 years immediately before the application is made, the identified person held one or more of the following for a total period of at least 3 years:

    (i)a Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa granted on the basis that the person satisfied the criterion in subclause 457.223(4) of Schedule 2 as in force before 18 March 2018;

    (ii)a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Medium‑term stream;

    (iii)for a person specified in a legislative instrument made under subparagraph (a)(iii)—a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short‑term stream;

    (f)unless paragraph (g) applies—during the period of 4 years immediately before the application is made, the identified person was employed in the position in relation to which the visa, or visas, mentioned in paragraph (e) were granted:

    (i)for a total period of at least 3 years (not including any periods of unpaid leave); and

    (ii)on a full‑time basis, with the employment being undertaken in Australia;

    (g)if the visa, or visas, mentioned in paragraph (e) were granted in relation to an occupation specified in an instrument made under subregulation 2.72(13)—during the period of 4 years immediately before the application is made, the identified person was employed in the occupation for a total period of at least 3 years (not including any periods of unpaid leave);

    (h)the nominator:

    (i)was the standard business sponsor who last identified the identified person in a nomination approved under section 140GB of the Act; and

    (ii)is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia;

    (j)the application identifies a need for the identified person to be employed in the position, under the direct control of the nominator;

    (k)there is a genuine need for the identified person to be employed in the position, under the direct control of the nominator;

    (l)the identified person will be employed on a full‑time basis in the position for at least 2 years;

    (m)the terms and conditions of the identified person’s employment will not include an express exclusion of the possibility of extending the period of employment;

    (n)the nominator’s business has the capacity to employ the identified person for at least 2 years and to pay the person at least the annual market salary rate for the occupation each year;

    (o)the requirements set out in subregulation 2.72(15) are met, applying subregulations 2.72(15) and (16) as if:

    (i)paragraph 2.72(15)(a) did not apply; and

    (ii)references to the nominee were references to the identified person; and

    (iii)references to the person were references to the nominator;

    (p)either:

    (i)there is no information known to Immigration that indicates that the employment conditions (other than in relation to earnings) that will apply to the identified person are less favourable than those that apply, or would apply, to an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident performing equivalent work at the same location; or

    (ii)it is reasonable to disregard any such information;

    (q)the nominator has provided the information required by the Minister for the purposes of paragraph (k) to (n).

    Minister may vary certain Temporary Residence Transition stream requirements

    (6)The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine different periods of time for the purposes of paragraphs (5)(e), (f) and (g) for persons specified in the instrument.

    (7)Paragraphs (5)(j), (k) and (l) do not apply in relation to occupations specified in an instrument made under subregulation 2.72(13).

    (8)The Minister may, by legislative instrument, specify:

    (a)occupations for the purposes of paragraph (5)(c); and

    (b)persons who are exempt from the operation of that paragraph; and

    (c)for each occupation, any matters for the purposes of determining whether the occupation applies to an identified person, including matters relating to any of the following:

    (i)the nominator;

    (ii)the identified person;

    (iii)the occupation;

    (iv)the position in which the identified person is to work;

    (v)the circumstances in which the occupation is undertaken;

    (vi)the circumstances in which the person is to be employed in the position.

Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Statutory Construction

  • Natural Justice

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

4

Statutory Material Cited

0