Singh v Khan & Ors

[2022] HCASL 123

SINGH

v

KHAN & ORS

[2022] HCASL 123
S52/2022
S54/2022

1. The applicant requires an extension of time in respect of each application but it would be futile to grant each extension. 

   S52/2022

2. The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from that part of the decision of the Federal Court of Australia (Bromwich J) which dismissed the applicant's application for Bromwich J to recuse himself from hearing the applicant's application for an extension of time and leave to appeal from two earlier decisions of the Federal Court of Australia (Stewart J) and dismissed a related application for, among other things, an order that the applicant be provided with an audio recording of a hearing before the Federal Court of Australia.  The application to this Court raises no question of principle and does not enjoy any prospects of success.  Further, it is not in the interests of justice to grant special leave to appeal.  The application for special leave to appeal should be refused.

   S54/2022

3. The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from that part of the decision of the Federal Court of Australia (Bromwich J) which dismissed the applicant's application for Bromwich J to recuse himself from hearing an appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (Judge Street).  This further application raises no question of principle and does not enjoy any prospects of success.  Further, it is not in the interests of justice to grant special leave to appeal.  The application for special leave to appeal should be refused.

4. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing each application.

M.M. Gordon	S.H.P. Steward
11 August 2022