Singh (Migration)
[2018] AATA 1137
•5 April 2018
Singh (Migration) [2018] AATA 1137 (5 April 2018)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Jagjot Singh
CASE NUMBER: 1719510
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2017/1030609
MEMBER:P. Wood
DATE:5 April 2018
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500. 213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Statement made on 05 April 2018 at 12:16pm
CATCHWORDS
Migration – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – English language requirements – Applicant provided English language test scores – Satisfies the requirementsLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2 cl 500.213STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 15 March 2017. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 7 August 2017.
The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of English language ability was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
The applicant has since provided the Tribunal with a copy of a PTE academic institution score report with an overall score of 43. In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
P. Wood
Senior Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0