Singh (Migration)

Case

[2018] AATA 2062

17 April 2018


Singh (Migration) [2018] AATA 2062 (17 April 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Baldeep Singh

CASE NUMBER:  1803083

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2017/3338999

MEMBER:Stephen Witts

DATE:17 April 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:

·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 17 April 2018 at 2:10pm

CATCHWORDS
Migration – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – Evidence of English language proficiency provided – Decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 500.213

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 13 September 2017. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 31 January 2018.

  2. The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of English language ability was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).

  3. On 23 March 2018 the Tribunal received an IELTS Test Report Form with an overall Band Score of 5.5.In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    DECISION

  4. The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:

    ·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

    Stephen Witts
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0