SINGH (Migration)

[2018] AATA 2482

SINGH (Migration) [2018] AATA 2482 (31 May 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr KARANBIR SINGH

CASE NUMBER:  1705749

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2016/2774768

MEMBER:M. Edgoose

DATE AND TIME OF

ORAL DECISION AND REASONS:          31 May 2018 at 1:02 pm (VIC time)

DATE OF WRITTEN RECORD:                19 June 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne, Victoria

DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision under review.

Statement made on 19 June 2018 at 2:54pm

CATCHWORDS

Migration – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) – Subclass 500 (Student) – Genuine student – Certificate of Enrolment not provided – Decision under review affirmed

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 1.03 Schedule 2 cls 500.111, 500.211, 500.212

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 9 March 2017 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) Subclass 500 visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. At the hearing on 31 May 2018 the Tribunal made an oral decision and gave an oral statement of decision and reasons. The following is the written record of those reasons.

   STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

3. This is an oral decision in case number 1705749 of Karanbir Singh. 

4. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 9 March 2017 to refuse to grant you a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under section 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

5. You applied for the visa on 22 August 2016 to undertake study in Australia.  At the time the application was lodged, the Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa contained two subclasses, Sub-class 500 (Student) and Sub-class 590 (Student Guardian).  The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria from Sub-class 590 (Student Guardian) visa.

6. The delegate in your case refused to grant the visa on the basis that you did not satisfy the requirements of clause 500.212 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations), because the delegate was not satisfied that you were a genuine student who intends genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily.

7. You appeared before the Tribunal today to give evidence and present arguments. 

8. While the issue before the delegate was whether you are a genuine temporary entrant, the issue before the Tribunal now is whether, at the time of this decision, you meet the enrolment requirements for a student visa.

9. The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The primary criteria in clause 500.211 to clause 500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria. The issue in this case is whether the applicant is enrolled in a course of study as required for the grant of a student visa.

10. Clause 500.211 relevantly requires that at the time of this decision the applicant is enrolled in a course of study:  clause 500.211(a).  The applicant does not claim to meet any of the alternative criteria in clause 500.211. 

11. ‘Course of study’ is relevantly defined in clause 500.111 of the regulations as a ‘full-time, registered course’.  ‘Registered course’ is defined in regulation 1.03 of the Regulations as a course of education or training provided by an institution, body or person that is registered, under Division 3 of Part 2 of the Education Services for Overseas Student Act 2000, to provide the course to overseas students.

12. On 3 May 2018, a written invitation to attend the hearing was sent to you via email.  In that invitation, you were requested to provide evidence of enrolment in an approved course of study to the Tribunal at least 7 days before the scheduled date of the hearing.  Such evidence has not been provided. 

13. At the hearing stay, you were again requested to provide the evidence to the Tribunal, such as a copy of your Certificate of Enrolment.  You have not done so.

    In your sworn evidence before the Tribunal, you confirmed that you were last enrolled in an Advanced Diploma of Management in July 2016.  You further confirmed in your sworn evidence that you are not currently enrolled, nor do you have a valid offer of enrolment in any course of study in Australia.

14. Accordingly, there is no evidence before me that you are currently enrolled now in or have a current offer of enrolment in any course of study.  Therefore, the Tribunal is not satisfied at the time of this decision that you are enrolled in a course of study and accordingly, clause 500.211 is not met. 

15. Given the above findings, the Tribunal finds that the criteria for the grant of Subclass 500 (Student) visa are not met.  The applicant does not claim to meet the criteria for Subclass 590 Student Guardian visa.  For these reasons, I have concluded that the decision under review should be affirmed. 

16. The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa. 

17. This decision is made at 1.02 pm on 31 May 2018. 

18. Thank you for attending the Tribunal today.  This hearing is now concluded, and I will ask the parties to leave the room.

    DECISION

19. The Tribunal affirms the decision under review.

    M. Edgoose
    Member