SINGH (Migration)
[2018] AATA 3024
•4 July 2018
SINGH (Migration) [2018] AATA 3024 (4 July 2018)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr NAVROOP SINGH
CASE NUMBER: 1720508
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2016/2066794
MEMBER:Mark Bishop
DATE:4 July 2018
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.
Statement made on 04 July 2018 at 10:35am
CATCHWORDS
Migration – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 570 Independent ELICOS Sector – dismissal decision – failure to attend Tribunal hearing – decision under review affirmed
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 362B, 362C
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 15 August 2017 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) Subclass 570 visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
On 31 May 2018 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s.362B(1A)(b) of the Act as the review applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.
The review applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s.362C(5). The review applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.
As the review applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.
DECISION
The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.
Mark Bishop
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
0
0
0