Simlesa and National Disability Insurance Agency (Practice and procedure)

Case

[2025] ARTA 1049

21 July 2025

No judgment structure available for this case.

Simlesa and National Disability Insurance Agency (Practice and procedure) [2025] ARTA 1049 (21 July 2025)

Applicant/s:  Rohan Simlesa

Respondent:  National Disability Insurance Agency

Tribunal Number:                2024/5305

Tribunal:General Member Gooch  

Place:  Adelaide 

Date:21 July 2025  

Decision:  

The Tribunal dismisses the substantive application for review under section 84(4) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024.

Statement made on 21 July 2025 at 12:26pm

Catchwords

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – National Disability Insurance Scheme – Review of participant supports – death of a participant – whether substantive review can continue before the Tribunal – application dismissed

Legislation

Administrative Review Tribunal (Consequential and Transitional Provisions No. 1) Act 2024 (Cth) Schedule 16, item 24.

Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (Cth) s84

National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth), s29

Cases

V120/00A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 264

Reasons for Decision

1.This decision was forwarded to me to be completed without hearing.

2.The Applicant, the late Mr Rohan Simlesa, was a participant of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (the Scheme). The Scheme is administered under the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) (the NDIS Act).

3.On 12 February 2024 a delegate of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the National Disability Insurance Agency (the Agency) made a decision to fund certain reasonable and necessary supports for Mr Simlesa. 

4.Mr Simlesa requested an internal review of this decision seeking to have additional supports funded under his plan. On 28 June 2024 another delegate of the CEO affirmed the original decision (the decision under review).

5.On 25 July 2024 Mr Simlesa, through his mother, Ms Maya Simlesa, applied to the Administrative Review Tribunal (the AAT) for review of this decision.

6.From 14 October 2024 the AAT became the Administrative Review Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’). Under the transitional provisions in the Administrative Review Tribunal (Consequential and Transitional Provisions No. 1) Act 2024 (the Transitional Act)applications for review to the AAT that were not finalised before 14 October 2024 are taken to be applications for review to the Tribunal. The Transitional Act gives the Tribunal the authority to continue and finalise any aspect of the review not already completed by the AAT. This decision and statement of reasons is made by the Tribunal.

7.Mr Simlesa was represented in his application by Legal Aid in the Northern Territory. 

8.On 16 July 2025 a representative from Legal Aid NT advised the Tribunal and the Agency that Mr Simlesa had passed away on 7 July 2025. Funeral notices in the NT News (online) dated 18 July 2025 confirm this event.

9.Legal Aid NT further advised that Ms Maya Simlesa, the applicant’s mother, did not intend to apply to continue with the substantive application and was of the view that due to its limited extent, no application would need to be made for a grant of representation to administer Mr Simlesa’s estate.[1]

[1] Email from Ms Alana Humphries, Legal Aid NT dated 16 July 2025

10.I note the Agency does not object to the proposed dismissal application.[2]

[2] Email of Jacqueline Ziesel, Mills Oakley, dated 21 July 2025.

The legislative framework

11.Section 29 of the NDIS Act provides that a person ceases to be a participant in the Scheme on their death and may not be paid any amounts for supports after they cease to be a participant.

12.Section 46A of the NDIS Act provides that an NDIS amount, being an amount paid in respect of provision of supports under a participant’s plan, is absolutely inalienable.

13.In the Federal Court decision of V120/00A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 264 Kenny J (when considering the impact of the applicant’s death on the right to continue a review of a refusal to grant a protection visa) held that when, as here, a statutory entitlement does not pass to another on the applicant’s death, then death extinguishes that entitlement.[3]

[3] At [53]

14.Section 84 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 makes provision for the death of an applicant prior to completion of the Tribunal’s review. The net result of section 84 is that in a proceeding before the Tribunal for review of a decision (the substantive application), where the relevant applicant dies and there is no-one else who may apply to continue the matter, the Tribunal may dismiss the application.

CONSIDERATION

15.The decision under review in this matter was a decision in relation to a plan of future supports for Mr Simlesa’s. 

16.With his death Mr Simlesa’s participation in the Scheme is now ended, along with any entitlement to NDIS amounts. There is no other person to whom these supports could pass.

17.Ms Maya Simlesa has advised Legal Aid NT that due to the limited size of Mr Simlesa’s estate, it is unlikely that any formal orders for administration of that estate will be required.[4]

[4] Email from Ms Alana Humphries

18.Having regard to section 84(2) I am satisfied that there are no persons who may apply to the Tribunal to continue with the substantive application.

DECISION

The Tribunal dismisses the substantive application for review under s84(4) Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024.

Date(s) of hearing: On the papers   
Date final submissions received: 21 July 2025   
Solicitors for the Applicant: Legal Aid NT
Solicitors for the Respondent: Mills Oakley

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0